this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
94 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

70996 readers
3614 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know abou that. I don't want to manage visiting dozens of websites.

Technically it is also possible to make interactionless feeds with no live and share bottons

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

How's visiting dozens of pages different from visiting dozens of websites?

And BTW, on sites where feeds are in fashion, maybe some kind of Usenet upgraded for HTML and Markdown and post\author hyperlinks would be more in place.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Visiting feeds is like using tools from one organized toolbox. Visiting many websites is like jumping between many separate toolboxes

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

No. You have a toolbox, it's called a web browser. To unite the particular websites you have a web ring, or your own bookmarks. There were also web catalogues.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Bookmark at not intuitive enough to me and RSS feeds are still feeds that have no interaction features like the writer of this article like.

I am always for giving the most power to users. I like compromises like user settings so people who want a feed with interactions can and who doesn't can disable it

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

But why do we need interactive crap for everything. Comments and etc for articles are the worst. Not everybody needs to hear you, sometimes you’ve just gotta take in information and process it.

Like I literally Maintain my own fleet of apps that give me just the article body images, in a sorted feed. No ads. No links. Nothing. Even the links to other articles, etc in the middle of an article is too much. I hate that shit. Modern web page design is garbage and unreadable.

I don’t need to know stacy from North Dakota’s thoughts on an article because 99% of the time it’s toxic anyways. Or misinformed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Interactiviry seems to be a good thing. What brings you to participate here on Lemmy?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

Reading content. I'm more of a lurker compared to most users.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

Modern web page design is garbage and unreadable.

Because it's a "newspaper meets slot machine" design. Kills two birds with one stone, hijacking media (censorship is invisible) and making money (invisible too).

I don’t need to know stacy from North Dakota’s thoughts on an article because 99% of the time it’s toxic anyways. Or misinformed.

And also because not every place is supposed to be crawling with people.