this post was submitted on 25 May 2025
578 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

70415 readers
3529 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 days ago (5 children)

The fact that most people would obviously never want to get a brain chip implant, combined with the fact that multiple billionaires are developing brain chip implants, indicates that there are plans in some circles to incentivize or coerce people into getting a brain chip implant at some point in the future.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It’s risk/reward. If brain chips made me twice as productive or intelligent, I’d probably tolerate a lot more risk than if it was just a way to check my Instagram notifications without pulling out my phone.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Productive or intelligent for whose benefit? If it's so that you can perform better under wage labor conditions, that's coercion.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I am self-employed. So myself, I guess.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Well then hell yea, it's likely you won't be coerced into it's use. Though sticking to my original prediction, that means you won't be the demographic it gets marketed to or pushed upon.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

I suspect you are all too right.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Medicine in the US is very expensive. There is a lot of money in helping with neurological conditions or paralysis.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What if you were going to die but you could live indefinitely if you got the implant? Would an incentive like that interest you?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

So like the black mirror episode Common People

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Why would a brain implant allow me to live indefinitely?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I would explain it to you - but you would need the brain implant to understand the context completely. Are you interested in getting the implant now?* :)

* (Post may or may not be sponsored by the brain implant company™)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

They've existed for awhile for people with certain disabilities and further advancements in the field would be great for the people who actually need them, but outside of that niche most people would likely not want to risk a highly invasive surgery and I don't think they actually care about them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

If they could make them small / sensitive enough to make them subdermal, without the risky brainsurgery, that would be an absolute gamechanger and would increase acceptance by a lot. if the process would be like getting a few piercings under local anesthesia, it would make servicing the hardware much less of a life and death decision, and i wouldn't mind getting something like that - especially if it's on the hackability scale of a steam deck lol