this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
119 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

70285 readers
4735 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

No the laser didn't produce anything the laser is powered by a power source, and that power source produced that much energy.

It's like saying that an ultrasonic saw produces power, no it doesn't, you already have to have that power to feed into the ultrasonic saw.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago

The laser didn’t generate 2 quadrillion watts like a power plant would generate electricity, but it delivered that much power in an extremely short pulse, like 20 quadrillionths of a second.

That means the energy it delivered was relatively small (a few hundred joules), but because it was delivered in such a tiny time window, the power (which is energy per unit time) was immense.

The laser did produce power, in the form of intense light and heat, over a very small time period. It converted 2 quadrillion watts of electric energy into a very brief laser pulse.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

That's not strictly true.

Chemical lasers absolutely generate their own power, you're thinking of electro-optically excited lasers.