this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
199 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

68245 readers
5389 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, it compresses better too though, and jpeg XL can be configured to compress lossless, which I imagine would also work here

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Lossless JPEG would be amazing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

JPEG 2000 supports lossless mode.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In my experience, as you increase the quality level of a jpeg, the compression level drops significantly, much more than with some other formats, notably PNG. I'd be curious to see comparisons with png and gif. I wouldn't be surprised if the new jpeg compresses better at some resolutions, but not all, or with only some kind of images.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

jpeg xl has been in development from FLIF for like 15 years there are tons of comparisons all over, even live ones on youtube