this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
767 points (96.7% liked)

Memes

45660 readers
1095 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

He wasn't introduced as a nazi, none of those MP's knew the truth about who they were standing for, and they wouldn't have if they did. Somebody didn't do background research, and old nazi never should have been anywhere near parliament. It's incompetence all around.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (7 children)

He was introduced as having fought the Russians during WW2, there's literally only one option as to what side that leaves him on. Either parliament is completely devoid of the most basic history education, or they knew damn well what they were applauding.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

IIRC, he fought the Russians to protect Ukraine from their invasion. He had no other allegiance to Germany or Nazis. It was a "the enemy of my enemy is my ally" situation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

He was literally in a volunteer division of the SS. Wtf do you mean no allegiance to the nazis? He was a nazi.

IIRC, he fought the Russians to protect Ukraine from their invasion.

Wtf is this historical revisionism? The soviets did not invade Ukraine, Germany did. He was fighting for the invaders.

https://www.britannica.com/place/Ukraine/The-Nazi-occupation-of-Soviet-Ukraine

Read this. Seriously.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)