Technology

60350 readers

5539 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1043

‘It’s Total Chaos Internally at Meta Right Now’: Employees Protest Zuckerberg’s Anti LGBTQ Changes (www.404media.co)

submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

231 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That exactly fits my definition. My definition says nothing about outcomes or if its true or not my definition is simply about expressing an opinion and you disliking it is proving me right.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Indeed, the whole point of my comment is that your definition is bad because it doesn't take into account if something is true or not. Edit: Or, and this is much MUCH more important, whether the statements in question cause real harm to other people.

I'm not accusing you of thought crime, I'm accusing you of stupidity and you disliking it is proving me right.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

your definition is bad because it doesn't take into account if something is true or not.

My interpretation of 1984 was that a thought crime had no regard for the truth.

Edit: Or, and this is much MUCH more important, whether the statements in question cause real harm to other people.

Words that are not calling for actionable violence can offend nothibg more nothibg less. And u taking offence is your choice and yoyr problem.

I'm not accusing you of thought crime, I'm accusing you of stupidity and you disliking it is proving me right.

I wasnt aware that anyone who disliked your ideas was stupid, thanks for enlightening me. Seems kinda self centred to me but i would be stupid to disagree with on that point.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 14 hours ago

My interpretation of 1984 was that a thought crime had no regard for the truth.

Only because The Party has no regard for the truth. If, in 1984, The Party were concerned with truth at all then thought crime would also be concerned with the truth. This is because the real definition of thought crime in the context of that story is any thought that isn't approved by The Party.

But you've brought the phrase "thought crime" out if that context and into the real world. Here, truth matters.

Words that are not calling for actionable violence can offend nothibg more nothibg less

Completely untrue, and very disturbing that you'd think otherwise.

anyone who disliked your ideas was stupid

That's not why you're stupid, it has nothing to do with me.