this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
310 points (93.8% liked)

> Greentext

7541 readers
437 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I think what would give cavemen pause would be if the house was on fire for 20,000 years.

That said, we definitely should have stayed on nuclear.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Don't know why you're being down voted, that's accurate. Dresden was set fucking alight like 80 years ago and was rebuilt. Chernobyl?

And yes, it's arguably cleaner than most fuel, just know what yours doing and don't put it on a flood plane!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Their comment agitates both the "nuclear bad" crowd and the "nuclear good" crowd :(

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

Ahhh, I get ya.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago

Chernobyl shows that worst case scenario is that we get large wildlife preserves.