Playing Diplomacy I'm pretty sure violates the Geneva convention.
thanks_shakey_snake
joined 1 year ago
Damn okay well if the hackers are at that level I guess you're just screwed.
Mine is not a Tesla, and its range is exaggerated... Or at least its range has a hidden asterisk that would read "under ideal conditions with a gentle driving style." It self-adjusts based on my recent driving history, and I mostly don't let the battery get low enough that I have to care about how precise it is... But it definitely skews heavily optimistic, especially when I first bought the car. It's roughly the same in that regard as a Tesla is, according to the Tesla drivers I know.
Whoa really? How did you figure it out? I'd love to do that with my car, even if it's a pain.
Let's see the hackers figure that one out!
How did you explain how McDobalds knows when you're broke or in a hurry?
It's just less visible/explicit. It's still bad press when it gets noticed and called out like in this thread, it's just sneakier.
Security implications?
People working with these technologies have known this for quite awhile. It's nice of Apple's researchers to formalize it, but nobody is really surprised-- Least of all the companies funnelling traincars of money into the LLM furnace.
I think you mean "Sacrilege" or maybe "Sacrilegious." That means "The violation of something sacred."
Sacrosanct means "sacred and beyond question," which is related, but kind of the opposite of what you mean.
Okay but how does starting a secure shell help?
For reference (as per Wikipedia):
Any organization that designs a system (defined broadly) will produce a design whose structure is a copy of the organization's communication structure.
— Melvin E. Conway
Imagine interpreting that as advice on how you should try to design things, lol.
Tbf, I think most of the post is just typical LinkedIn fluff, but I didn't want to take the poor fellow out of context.
view more: next ›
I cast Pass Without Trace