Technology

59374 readers

6250 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

838

EU considers calculating X fines by including revenue from Musk’s other firms (arstechnica.com)

submitted 4 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

109 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Actions you don’t like aren’t corrupt. Actions Elon doesn’t like aren’t corrupt.

Can you point to where I said or implied the opposite?

In fact arguably Elon is the corrupt individual in this case

I never said Elon was in the right. I have stated that his company must be punished for the decisions it made, not the owner as per the protections guaranteed by the law to company owners.

the EU is simply applying the law to the corrupt individual.

You mean the law that violates your rights as the head of a corporation, which is supposed to protect your assets from those of the company? Cool.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

So a company provides infinite protection?

"I didn't murder that man, the company did."

"The company paid individual X to murder them, not me."

No, that's ridiculous.

There is a line you can cross. Musk has crossed that line. Is it exactly written, if your name is Elon Musk and you own companies X, Y, & Z, and you perform actions A, B, C, you I'll be fined in this exact way? No. There is a grey area, and a group within the EU is allowed to make a more specific determination.

And do you know who agreed to these rules? Elon Musk. He chose to do business in the EU. He agreed to their rules.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

So a company provides infinite protection?

No. Never even suggested that.

"I didn't murder that man, the company did."

"The company paid individual X to murder them, not me."

Ridiculous stretch. I have stated multiple times, as has the law, the company provides financial protections, did I ever say anything else? Of course if you are involved in the murder of somebody you should be prosecuted. If you can’t argue in good faith don’t bother responding.

if your name is Elon Musk and you own companies X, Y, & Z, and you perform actions A, B, C, you I'll be fined in this exact way?

No. You can clearly state in the law that “if your company is found to violate a consumer protection law, your other assets will be in jeopardy if we can’t figure out a way to fine your company”. I wonder what would be the consequences of explicitly informing companies of the consequences of their actions.

And do you know who agreed to these rules? Elon Musk. He chose to do business in the EU. He agreed to their rules.

Yes he did. He agreed to the rule that states the company will be fined up to 6% of the yearly income, not whatever this is.