this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
113 points (88.4% liked)
Technology
58678 readers
3963 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
space should not be privatised
Cool, then get NASA to actually do something vs hamstringing itself with bureaucrats...the only reason people like you rage against SpaceX is because it's tied to that idiot musk.
everything spacex has done has been because of nasa.......
You're joking right? No they have not.... I love NASA, but acting like what spacex has done is only because of NASA is bullshit.
because everything spacex has done is because of nasa. all spacex does is toss unlimited money at exploding rockets and pollute the environment and ecosystem
SpaceX insisted on fixed price contracts. Unlike the other companies doing cost-plus contracts (aka unlimited money contracts), SpaceX sets a price on government services and then delivers for that price.
Lol no they have not
NASA is hamstringing itself? Tell me more. I don't know anything about NASA, but I would have guessed the bureaucrats were external.
The US government moreso than NASA as funding for them as been an easy punching bag for both political parties lately.
The other thing is optics. NASA isn't allowed to blow up 20 rockets on their designs. They only get one chance to get it right. That's why the SLS has only 1 launch and is 1/1 as opposed to the SpaceX Dragon and Starship can just throw money at them until they work.
Not saying one way is better than the other, just that NASA has to fight not to make the front page because 9/10 it means they made a mistake which costs them more funding. IMO all of this is going to come up to a very slow pace akin to NASA when we start with crewed missions (SpaceX Starship will be mission controlled by NASA as well). They super don't fuck around with crewed launches, especially after the botched Boeing Space launch. And a crew launch failure affects everyone SpaceX and NASA alike.
NASA has a ton of internal bureaucracy, hell they have an article on it.
https://www.nasa.gov/missions/artemis/nasa-vision-sparked-commercial-space-revolution-on-space-coast/
Space should not be centrally controlled
Absolutely if private entities want to go to space they should be able to. What grounds would you block them on? This is not a substitution or replacement of public space agencies
then they shouldn't get any federal money or contracts
Why? They're providing a service with that contract. NASA isn't capable or doesn't want to do everything in house. If they deem it beneficial to outsource some projects to contractors then what's wrong with that?