SparrowRanjitScaur

joined 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Machine learning is AI. I think the term you're looking for is general artificial intelligence, and no one is claiming LLMs fall under that label.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

The thing is, if he had access to his hard drive at any point in the last 10 years or so he would have sold his Bitcoin long before it was this valuable, like many, many other people who used to own Bitcoin and aren't currently millionaires. The fact that he lost his hard drive is the only reason it's actually worth anything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Why? They're providing a service with that contract. NASA isn't capable or doesn't want to do everything in house. If they deem it beneficial to outsource some projects to contractors then what's wrong with that?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Absolutely if private entities want to go to space they should be able to. What grounds would you block them on? This is not a substitution or replacement of public space agencies

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Because it tastes good.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It's just a tool like any other. An experienced developer knows that you can't apply every tool to every situation. Just like you should know the difference between threads and coroutines and know when to apply them. Or know which design pattern is relevant to a given situation. It's a tool, and a useful one if you know how to use it.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (16 children)

Extremely misleading title. He didn't say programmers would be a thing of the past, he said they'll be doing higher level design and not writing code.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Maybe as a social signal for other humans.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

That's funny, but I love content created by individuals and small teams, especially the maker/engineering channels. I'll take that over corporate produced media any day, even if it means paying a corporation to serve that content to me.

They also have one of the best business models for creators, meaning people producing content can do it full time and make a good living off of it, instead of doing it as a charity and producing mediocre quality videos.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

I agree with all your points, not using the service is absolutely an option. I suggested paying for premium because that was the option that made the most sense to me. I hate ads and love YouTube. For me, the value I get from a subscription is much higher than other services I pay for. I'm subscribed to probably 500 YouTube channels and probably watch between 50-100 hours of content per month.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Like many other business they offer an ad funded service and a paid service. I understand this is Lemmy, and people love getting things for free. But if you don't like ads, have you thought about paying for the service?

view more: next ›