There was a golden age when computers were something you owned, not like before when they were big machines your employer or university would give out access to, nor like after when they went to the cloud, you bought what was essentially a thin client and every software became a service.
At least in the olden days the computers weren't forced into every single damn part of society!
Now in order to talk with most of your friends and family, you have to sell your soul to every one of the thousand ToS's. It's impossible to meaningfully use your personal device you bought with your own money without the internet, as every app and their mom needs to call home for some reason. For some reason, it is morally acceptable for a company to prevent you from being able to have someone you pay to replace parts of your device with third-party components you bought with your own money!
Now, of course, you can simply install some Libre operating system and use Lemmy, or Mastodon or whatever. But computers are so embedded into society that it is simply impossible to go without these services unless you want to get yourself isolated (and potentially in trouble with the authorities).
Besides, from prior experience, most people are unwilling to use technologies unless it is physically placed in front of them, whether through social influences, advertising or word of mouth, which generally corporate services do better than Libre alternatives.
It used to be that computers and programs were made for the end user. Now they are simply tools for ad and data-collection companies to extract every byte of personal data and force every second of advertising on others.
I've been seriously considering to remove computers from most aspects of my life, but as paper slowly disappears from our lives, this becomes harder and harder. Now you would likely be fired if you refused to use Teams or Slack or whatever your company uses. No one uses fax or writes mail or watches live TV anymore.
The only other alternative is to take back computers and make them personal again.
Just install Linux and see for yourself that it's not that hard and definitely won't get you in trouble.
Of course, you'll see all the same shit, but it won't be as pervasive.
Yes, that's true. Which is why I'm sort of a luddite - I want simpler devices with more limited (and likely not universal) functionality, so that they'd just work when they should and not work when they shouldn't. That is what should be given to ignorant people. Not something complex and spyware-ridden.
Sort of like ... pagers, from the recent association with that terrorist act committed by Israel.
I think there's a very big niche for simple electronic devices. Like you'd still often use hammer and nails at home, not an electric device with screwdriver mode, drill mode, hammer mode etc.
A separate device for texting and voice\video calls, with simple firmware to which support of different protocols can be added (distributed, say, just as plugins). A separate device for listening to music. A separate device to take photos and videos, I think we had something like this, what was it called I wonder, lol.
It may well be that the combined cost and efficiency for each application of a bunch of such simple devices will be better than with a smartphone. In such a case using them is optimal. It's also good for economy - instead of a rather powerful machine requiring TSMC-produced stuff they'd need a few MCs that can be produced in many places of our planet, competition and decentralization are good for everyone. It's also good for security - instead of very complex Android and iOS software stacks you'd have dedicated devices with smaller attack surface. It's good for your mental health - human brain works better with dedicated physical things. It's even good for fashion, I think even clubbing girls are starting to get tired of big dumb square pieces of glass with fingerprints all over them.
And it's good for the industry.
I'd use something like a Star Wars datapad with a e-ink display, too.
What you wrote is not an old fart rant. It's the only sane position on that. Not everything new is progress. Not everything new is better. Not everything more complex is more functional for one's practical needs.