this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
26 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
59207 readers
2513 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
From the article, it looks like the focus is on the more relevant parts for hydrogen, the chemical and steel industries.
Those and long haul vehicles (planes and ships) seem like the places where hydrogen is more relevant / the only realistic option at the moment.
They can make steel with just electricity and I don't see why if you are making a fuel for planes why you wouldn't make straight kerosene.
I can see how you could mass produce hydrogen for industry then use it in winter. But I can also see all high energy industries going to places with good solar.
The future is going to be weird that's for sure.
~~No~~. Here's why.
Edit: ok, guess it is possible.
Here's a company doing it. https://www.canarymedia.com/articles/clean-industry/green-steel-without-green-hydrogen-can-it-work