this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
754 points (97.1% liked)
Technology
59148 readers
3105 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What are blueskys current userbase numbers, mastodons current userbase numbers, and are they federated with each other?
no. there's a sort of a third party bridge, but it requires an account on one platform to follow a bot in order to show up on another, so if someone on Bluesky doesn't explicitly do it and you're using Mastodon, then you're not going to connect.
Two competing federation standards. The VHS and Betamax, or Blu Ray and HD-DVD, of 2024.
Bluesky: https://bsky.jazco.dev/stats Mastodon: https://fedidb.org/software/mastodon
There isn’t a 1:1 comparison. But the closest comparison looks like Mastodon is on a bit of a decline at 800k MAU. Bluesky is roughly 400k daily likers.
fedidb.org
That does not seem to know about Bluesky
It does, however, know about Mastodon.
Right, because FediDB tracks activitypub, which bluesky is not built upon.
...right but, as I said, Mastodon is. Which is what they asked about...
Oh, right. I guess I forgot all the individual questions. My bad.
Is there a point you'd like to make or are you just here for the personal insults?
How did you take away "they were asking about Mastodon" when the question mentioned bluesky first? OP was asking for a comparison of the two, which your link does not provide, putting your answer somewhere between unhelpful and irrelevant.
You keep arguing with people pointing this out as if your response was a complete answer... It seems like you cherry picked the middle of their question and ignored the rest. The more-generous interpretation of this scenario is that your reading comprehension sucks. That's my point.
And if you're really feeling so insulted by my pointing that out,
edit: and it would have taken such a small additional effort to maybe clarify that you were only addressing part of the question instead of dropping a link with no explanation. You could've prevented a lot of confusion by being a little less lazy in your original reply.
Because it mentioned Mastodon second? Is the order really relevant here?
In order to make a comparison, you need data about both. I gave them half. I don't have the other half. My sincerest apologies for trying to be helpful, sire.
That never happened. You just made that up.
The most generous interpretation of your replies is that you're an ass who likes going around picking fights with people for the most ridiculous and mundane bullshit imaginable.
Sure, but dari does not address 2/3rds of their answer. Just posting a link makes it seem like it does. You could've added that it only addresses Mastodon's user base from their answer and not Bluesky's nor wether they can communicate.
Dude, grow up.
that's for fediverse. not bluesky
They asked about Mastodon...
They do not federate with each other AFAIK, Mastodon's user base is in another user's answer, Bluesky's IDK except apparently one million more than before