this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
44 points (92.3% liked)

Memes

45666 readers
903 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (80 children)

Tankie is just a slur for people who aren’t ideological and financially compromised by the United Treats of America.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (79 children)

Found the tankie.

Honestly What bullshit.

Tankie is a slur for authoritarian communists.

There is a healthy and honest way to appreciate communism, Russia, the CCP and even DPRK.

And then there are people who are completely shilling the CCP Russia DPRK as communist uptopias. These people are tankies.

If you are unable to recoginze the atrocities commited at any point in history, by the USA China, Russia , or any other country for that Matter. You're a chump.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is a healthy and honest way to appreciate communism, Russia, the CCP and even DPRK.

Please tell us more about those healthy and honest "anti-authoritarian" non-tankie communists. Who are they and what political results have they made?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sankara is a tankie by everyone's definition here. He came to power via a coup, held military tribunals trying people for corruption, formed armed groups to defend the revolution, and was vehemently against NATO, the IMF, and other western powers.

What does anti-authoritarian mean to you if Sankara is anti-authoritarian

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Also arrested trade union leaders and got into it with a teacher's union. I obviously support Sankara, and like you say he's really not different from any other communist leaders except that he was assassinated and his work undone.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

He came to power via a coup, held military tribunals trying people for corruption, formed armed groups to defend the revolution, and was vehemently against NATO, the IMF, and other western powers.

You think trying people for corruption make you authoritarian?

Are you a liberal?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think that authoritarian is a basically meaningless term when applied to a states.

All states are in the business of using lethal violence, or the threat of it at least, to enforce their rule within their borders.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thats why i am an anarchist......

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Okay so if being "authoritarian" is bad and means you shouldn't be supported, and Sankara ran a state, making him authoritarian, by a definition you're now agreeing with (again, anyone who runs a state) why are you pretending you don't think he's an authoritarian and trying to use him as a cudgel against people who actually share an ideology with him?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

oh god oh fuckxi-gun

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Sankara supported the USSR and DPRK, just like all actual communists do

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Im not a communist, i am an anarchist.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then why are you telling communist to read about Sankara, a figure we already know and love

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Becuase he is am example of a communist I support.

People keep calling me a liberal. Im an anarchist.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sankara was ML like all the people you're calling tankies. I respect him too. What makes him good and and the rest of us evil "authoritarians"?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because Sankara (sadly) lost. Baizuos can only accept communists when they lose.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Exactly. They won't answer the question though.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Sankara was a tankie

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

What do you think about Bakunin?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Im not a communist, i am a fedposting

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He set up Popular Revolutionary Tribunals to prosecute public officials charged with political crimes[12] and corruption, considering such elements of the state counter-revolutionaries.[15] This led to criticism by Amnesty International for human rights violations, including extrajudicial executions and arbitrary detentions of political opponents.[16]

idk sounds pretty authoritarian to me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

His country had corruption!

Im sure there is a better way but your acting like having tribunals makes you authoritarian.

It doesn't.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Statists using tribunals to try other statists is the use of state authority and the use of the state's monopoly on the legitimate use of force. If "Authoritarian" means anything at all then using the power of the state to prosecute people who are doing state stuff in ways you don't like is authoritarian.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wonder if any other countries had to deal with corruption after the revolution... thinkin-lenin

load more comments (77 replies)
load more comments (77 replies)