Technology

60033 readers

2986 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1153

ISP to Supreme Court: We shouldn’t have to disconnect users accused of piracy (arstechnica.com)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

172 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It feels dirty to agree with an ISP on something. But even the worst corporations are on the right side of something from time to time I suppose.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don’t pirate these days, but when I did (and was stupid about it) the emails/letters had pretty exact evidence.

They included the name of the work, my WAN IP address at the time, and the amount of data transferred (uploaded) out from it.

This was in the US and I’m unaware of how such notices work in other countries that work similarly.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's all they can get though they have no proof it was actually you and not someone else using your Internet, how they find out is they join the public trackers and just log everyone in it generally even without a VPN on private trackers they have no idea what you are doing

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

I think their goal is to tie the evidence to the ISP account, not necessarily name exactly who was pirating that work.