this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
100 points (89.1% liked)
Technology
59287 readers
5759 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Immutable, not really a difference. Bad updates can still break the OS.
AB root, however, it would be much easier to fix, but would still be a manual process.
Aren't most immutable Linux distros AB, almost by definition? If it's immutable, you can't update the system because it's immutable. If you make it mutable for updates, it's no longer immutable.
The process should be:
That's how immutable systems work. The main alternative is a PXE system, and in that case you fix the image in one place and power cycle all your machines.
If you're mounting your immutable system as mutable for updates, congratulations, you have the worst of immutable and mutable systems and you deserve everything bad that happens because of it.
idk if it would be manual, isn't the point of ab root to rollback if it doesn't properly boot afterwards?
Honestly if you're managing kernel and userspace remotely it's your own fault if you don't netboot. Or maybe Microsoft's don't know what the netboot situation looks like in windows land.