this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
308 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

58115 readers
3920 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They all get cybersecurity insurance to limit/eliminate that risk and pass it down to someone else. Yeah, we're at a point where companies have accepted it'll happen and pay for fucking cybersecurity insurance to protect their capital instead of spending that money on actual security.

Increasing the liability just means the premiums will be passed down to the users, and insurance companies will be rolling in cash. Not like the users would get the settlements anyway.

And of course there's the whole problem of disposable LLCs, so even a corporate death penalty would do shit, because our society doesn't give a shit about people, only capital.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Needs to be a percentage of revenue earned to eliminate the possibility of passing the buck. So... It's not happening any time soon.

  • Someone who has to pay higher rates because PG&E exec pocketed revenue instead of investing in company infrastructure, killing numerous people across multiple incidents.