this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
1014 points (98.9% liked)

Privacy

32424 readers
346 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
1014
Internet Archive is in danger (www.battleforlibraries.com)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

It looks like the internet archive is needed assistance, I just heard about this today and figured lemmy could help spread this message around

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Lol, a petition won't stop this unless it's a petition to bribe the judge. The US is owned by corporations.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Sure, but it is still better than doing nothing.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

It feels better than doing nothing.
If you can convince yourself you're not doing nothing.
I've never been that good a liar.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Large petitions also serve as a way of getting the word out.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yep. Petition gets large enough for media attention, word is spread, MAYBE people get active.

But Then police beat on them, Trump supporters defend the corporate interests of their supreme lord, it all goes down the shitter anyway.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So don’t ever get active or protest or do anything?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Dude I'm in Portland. That's all we do

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Ok…so I don’t get your point then. Your previous comment heavily implied it’s all pointless.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'll get back to you after the next election

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You’re still dodging responding directly here but ok.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Reply to the "so don't do anything?" jump straight to nihilism in response to suggestion that one route hasn't been successful lately in the near military state? Like we've never heard of Occupy Wall Street, million women march, Antifa?

No I didn't take it as a serious enough question. It was a judgement question, not a curiosity one. A curious question would have been "if you don't think that works, what could be done instead?"

"But ok."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

You said protests lead to a brick wall dude. I don’t know what to tell you. What’s the point of that comment if not to discourage public protests?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But you jumped from "protests haven't been effective" to "so don't do anything?"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

No, you naysayed protests and then just left it at that. You never said they’re still worth doing, you never provided an alternative, you just said functionally said “it’s pointless“ by rattling off how they hit a wall and then expected me to not take it that way. Bizarre.

We are just going in circles. If you meant something else you’ve had plenty of opportunity to explain yourself. But you continue not to. So until you clarify your stance, I’m going to take the thing you originally said as written. I’m not getting bogged down in “that’s not what I said but I’m not going to say what I meant and keep it as opaque as possible.” Say what you mean or just drop it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You really need to check your ego. You keep thinking that I'm avoiding some discussion or debate with you or something. But you're not even reading what I'm saying. I don't care about your disingenuous question.

THE SECOND you put "so do nothing?" you weren't interested in my thought. You just want to judge. That's it. You want to be right and argue why you're right. So I didn't respond to your "so do nothing?" Because it isn't genuine. I tried to explain that to you, but you still think I'm just avoiding "the question".

What I mean is if you want to discuss with someone, don't take a cynical comment and immediately apply nihilism if your intent is to learn and discuss. My intent wasn't to learn and discuss. Neither was yours. Because you demand a response doesn't mean you are entitled to anything. And if someone doesn't want to stumble along your thinking path doesn't mean they're avoiding your judgemental question. It may, however, mean they've dismissed your question

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago

I don't know.

I still think there's at least some value, even if the only thing it accomplishes is getting people to talk about it. Many people have never even heard of The Internet Archive.

Either way, there isn't really a reason not to.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Only things that are effective are better than doing nothing. Doing ineffective things only gives a false sense of accomplishment and thus reduces the incentive to try harder to be effective, which means they're actually worse than doing nothing.

Online petitions, "free speech zones," and other easily-ignorable things are like honeypots for activism, designed to neuter it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Sure, but "effectiveness" is usually not a binary and is often difficult to measure. Small, but persistent changes should still add up. Eventually.

So long as people recognize that these things are in fact quite toothless, I'm not sure they are entirely detrimental. There's no reason this couldn't be used as a starting point for more effective action, now that signatories are in greater contact with the campaign.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's not even a question of being "owned by corporations". Judges don't care about petitions. They're not politicians, their job is to adjudicate the law.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

In theory. In the US, at least (I don't know about other countries), some judge positions are voted in, In that sense, they most certainly are politicians.

On top of that, HAVE YOU SEEN OUR SUPREME COURT. THAT SHIT'S THE HALLMARK CHANNEL OF "OWNED BY OTHER ENTITIES", be it actual politicians (Trump) or CEOs (also Trump), many of whom ARE both executives and politicans (again, not only Trump, but also a number of other reps & senators).

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

C'mon it's at least worth a shot. To me at least.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

With the current judges we could probably buy one fairly cheap. Crowd source lobbying I guess