this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
701 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

60086 readers
2832 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
701
The Unity Games That Could be Impacted Most by Controversial Fees, From Silksong to Cult of the Lamb - IGN (www.ign.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
209 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No because this goes against GDPR. They aren't allowed to have anything identifying users "phoning home" without explicit consent/logging into a launcher.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

without explicit consent

Couldn't they just add another ToS checkbox to click when installing the game?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

TOS is given through the publisher who would be bound by GDPR by all sorts of regulations about storing that stuff.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If it included identifiable information then yeah it would be a breach. This is just using a mac address most likely that will also if they do it right will be hashed client side so even if a bad actor could do something with that info they won't actually get it anything from it anyway.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then we just fall back to the issue of them not being able to identify installs, reinstalls, bad actors spoofing the source etc..

If they could track installs properly they would have solved piracy already

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Well they've mainly said (recently) that they'll count new device installs, but not reinstallations on the same device. Which i believe. It's the whole, exemptions of charity sales and pirate copies is where they're spouting bullshit, or is PR/ higher ups making quick premises to placate without the engineers saying that that's possible, but now they've got to find a way. Which I don't think they will without heavily bloating the runtime into super shitty DRM realms