Technology

59421 readers

2819 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

154

The double sexism of ChatGPT’s flirty “Her” voice (www.vox.com)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

73 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Nope. She sued because she felt she was owed more money. Disney released the movie on their streaming service at the same time as it was released in cinema.

There was no "breach of contract", otherwise she would have won easily. Instead, she and Disney settled out of court. She was just being greedy. Disney probably didn't want the bad publicity and paid her off.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Settling out of court doesn't imply no one did anything wrong lol.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It also doesn't imply one did something wrong. They could just want to "pay the ransom" so their name doesn't get spread through the mud.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I literally never said it did. But you did say it implied the opposite.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

Sure, believe what you want to believe. I literally cannot be bothered to educate you.