this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
362 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

60080 readers
3358 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
362
After 16 years, Ecobee is shutting down support for the original smart thermostat (www.theverge.com)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
129 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

using it as I described really saves money

Assuming I:

  • own a heat pump ❌
  • own solar panels ❌
  • own a smart water heater of some kind? ❌
  • live somewhere that the temp changes enough that any of this matters ❌

"No you idiot, you just have to spends thousands of dollars on equipment and then you can save $100 a year"

Do you realize how ridiculous you sound? Good for you that you're saving money, but I'm just giving a personal anecdote here, not writing a thesis on home energy management.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

You don't need solar panels. Could also just be dynamic energy pricing. Also do not need a water heater. Thermal mass could just be heating the place at a certain time. Don't get the bit about temp changes, maybe you mean you never heat or cool your place?