Technology

59390 readers

2617 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

856

Rabbit R1 AI box revealed to just be an Android app (arstechnica.com)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

221 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Rabbit R1 AI box is actually an Android app in a limited $200 box, running on AOSP without Google Play.
Rabbit Inc. is unhappy about details of its tech stack being public, threatening action against unauthorized emulators.
AOSP is a logical choice for mobile hardware as it provides essential functionalities without the need for Google Play.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

1% correct is never “fairly high” wtf

It's all about context. Asking a bunch of 4 year olds questions about trigonometry, 1% of answers being correct would be fairly high. 'Fairly high' basically only means 'as high as expected' or 'higher than expected'.

Also if you want a computer that you don’t have to double check, you literally are expecting software to embody the concept of God. This is fucking stupid.

Hence, it is useless. If I cannot expect it to be more or less always correct, I can skip using it and just look stuff up myself.

[+] [email protected] -10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Obviously the only contexts that would apply here are ones where you expect a correct answer. Why would we be evaluating a software that claims to be helpful against 4 year old asked to do calculus? I have to question your ability to reason for insinuating this.

So confirmed. God or nothing. Why don't you go back to quills? Computers cannot read your mind and write this message automatically, hence they are useless

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Obviously the only contexts that would apply here are ones where you expect a correct answer.

That's the whole point, I don't expect correct answers. Neither from a 4 year old nor from a probabilistic language model.