this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
212 points (99.5% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54500 readers
732 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Why there's no decentralized github-like ?

[–] [email protected] 71 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Git is already decentralised. Every github-like is interoperable with every other github-like. But just because something works together with many others doesn't makes it invulnerable to legal takedowns. Nintendo is a gaming company. They have no problems playing whack-a-mole, as demonstrated here.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but Nintendo hasn't won a lawsuit, which means the code isn't illegal to share. They just convinced GitHub to take it down.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

They convinced GitHub to send takedown notices, which can be appealed. They're legally required to do this under the DMCA.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

I think there's a difference between distributed and decentralised. But apart from that 👍

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There's are a few, but they're pretty new. Codeberg / Forejo seems to be the most popular, at the moment.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But it's not yet federalized. I host my forgejo instance but others can't yet create issues there.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I've been kinda low key waiting for federation on Feorejo to move most of my personal projects off of GitHub. I've been busy anyway, so I guess, for me, it's a race between their clever devs and my procrastinating...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm so excited for it. Forgejo is by itself fully usable, but I want to be able to federate stuff.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Me too. GitHub is a huge part of my professional portfolio. I don't like trusting a single corporation with that much of my employment future. I saw colleagues who relied heavily of Twitter have a really bad time when it descended into bots and spam.

Forejo seems like the logical next step to protect my professional portfolio.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

GitHub is huge for visibility, don't underestimate it. I put everything on my git server and mirror my important projects to GitHub and codeberg.org. One of the things I'm excited about is a method of discover ability for my stuff. And if course collaboration being possible on my server, as others can't open issues and stuff on my server.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Yeah. I'll keep things on GitHub, as well. GitHub has been very good for my professional portfolio.

But I'm hoping to get to where my primary activity is on my own servers, and everything is mirrored to GitGub, or vice-versa. That way, if GitHub decides to hold my portfolio hostage, I can just redirect my resume link and get on with my life.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago
  • Forgejo: But ForgeFed, it's federation software is still under development
  • Radicle: But they have unnecessary ties with crypto stuff
[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago

Check out forgejo. While git is „decentralized“ it is not discoverable. Forgejo is pretty much there afaik using ap protocol.