this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
208 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

60052 readers
2853 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is a reason clickbait images and titles are used, they work. If they didn't work, no one would use them.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You must think marketing is made of infallible geniuses. Just because it exists doesn't make it good.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They didn’t say it was good, just that it’s what works; that’s why it’s everywhere.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nobody said "good", but if it keeps existing, it works or at least isn't harmful. Bit like evolution.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or there are people with an interest in keeping it that way.

I don't think there's any big conspiracy about YouTube titles, but let's not pretend thing like wealth inequality still exist because they're not harmful.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What "interest" would they have to keep it that way if it wasn't working?

Wealth inequality exists because it works for the people who have the power to control it. In a way, it's not harmful ENOUGH to change evolutionarily.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you serious? You literally answered your own question with the very next sentence.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

What? The original argument was "Just because it exists doesn’t make it good.", implying that it (click-bait thumbnails) doesn't necessarily work. To which I said that the fact that it exists means it works. To which you seemed to object by saying that there may be people who have an interest in it existing - like they want it to exist despite it actually not working. I'm confused about what it is you're saying.