this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
1020 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

35123 readers
61 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

They also sell headphone to USB cable. I'm not saying the lack of a headphone jack is good but if their goal was really to sell wireless earbuds then selling a USB to headphone cable was a bad move, no?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

A master plan to make more money selling a cable than a port on an already bulky phone?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes the 3.5mm port, known for its bulk. Perhaps we should remove cameras as they have actually bulked out phones in recent years.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

If I had the option I would have chosen a smaller camera module and included an audio jack. I genuinely think they choose to not include it as a compromise, rather than to sell a cable you can get cheap elsewhere.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

As Louis Rossmann also said, using a single port for both charging/moving data and listening music increases the wear on the port. They're just made to wear down faster with the absence of the audio jack port.

Plus it's impractical, as it occupies the type c port.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

What’s the lifetime of those ports you think?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

When you plug in in to charge, the device is at rest. When you plug in headphones, there’s a high chance it is in a pocket or otherwise in a state where the device is moving which will be a lot more wear than just idling charging.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Wow - would never have considered that! Great insight.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

I dont know, but if you also use it to plug in earphones you may double the use.

Im using my type c port phone for about 3.5years so far (I rarely plug headphones in it though) and the port seems ok.

But either way, this extra wear down is simply another negative aspect of this move and I think so far the disanvantages outweigh the advantages (also I think it's just so that they can sell their wireless earphones and on a lower degree support planned obsolesence).