136
Microsoft cuts ties with the Surface Duo after just 2 Android version updates
(www.windowscentral.com)
this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
136 points (97.2% liked)
Android
27941 readers
101 users here now
DROID DOES
Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules
1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.
2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.
4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.
5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.
6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.
7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.
8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.
Community Resources:
We are Android girls*,
In our Lemmy.world.
The back is plastic,
It's fantastic.
*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.
Our Partner Communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Why the hell would anyone buy these devices when the support is so short? And I'm not even specifically talking about this foldable, rather all these devices from Google and MS? You're basically paying good money for e-waste.
Their slogan should be "here, you throw it away for us".
I really hate Apple for other things, but they rarely pull this kind of crap when it comes to support.
I still have my Sega Genesis that I bought on launch day and up until a year ago,it still worked. Thatsa 30+ year old device. Somewhere in my parents basement is an ancient fake Walkman. It might not work as it,but but if you changed some o-rings, chances are it would work. That's gotta be well over 35 years old. I still have G1 Transformers when they were first released. These are all items that (for the most part), still work. And yet today, people can't even get more than 3 years on most devices. Not because the device is broken. Rather because the device is made to have a very short lifespan on purpose. This shit makes me so damn mad.
I know Europe has flirted with the idea of life cycle product management (can't quite remember the full name). Basically manufacturers are required to take back their products at the end of their life and dispose of them properly. These kinds of programs encourage manufacturers to make their products easier to tear down, and thus also easier to repair, but also to minimize the amount of non recyclable materials. When you put the responsibility on manufacturers to take care of these things, it is in their best interests to keep their products from turning into useless e-waste. It definitely wouldn't solve all the problems of products having super short lives, but it could help because if something is easier to tear down, then it might be easier to maintain ans possibly upgrade.
I understand the sentiment, but the comparison with Apple and the Sega Genesis is flawed.
Microsoft has been very good at supporting backwards compatibility with other products, and Apple has EOL'd products too soon as well.
Open a 30-yr-old laptop with Microsoft Windows 3.0 and, oh surprise, it also works... just like your Sega Genesis! Plus nobody said that the Surface Duo was going to stop working. Store it away for 30 years amd turn it back on. I'm sure it will work just fine. Just don't attempt to connect it to the Internet 18.0.
What examples were you thinking of?
iPhones, for example. https://www.macrumors.com/2022/06/08/apple-user-backlash-dropping-iphone-7-ios-16/
Granted, the lifespan is longer than the surface duo, but still. Apple does the same.
Oddly enough, I have an iPhone 7 I still use occasionally. It got a security update yesterday - https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT213913
6 years + 2-3 more years of security updates is a pretty good support cycle for a phone.
Complaining that the company that provides some of (if not the best) support for their phones is pretty silly. Especially considering that Google, androids gold standard is ~~a year~~ three years less than that.
Is it silly, though? Phones are essentially supercomputers at this point. It's hardly excusable that companies can't provide longer support.
They've always been computers. They just need to do different tasks than a computer would.
The phones OS is basically a firmware with how tightly integrated it is with the hardware. VS the EFI on your PC just hands everything off to windows and then it's up to drivers which may or may not be there after a major version update.
You don't have to explain to me how an electronic or digital phone works, but I appreciate the comment regardless.
And to be very technical: No, phones have not always been computers. I can't do Turing-complete work with a rotary phone from the 70s.
I can't say if it's what the person you're responding to had in mind but I noticed Macs have shorter supported lifespans than a comparable Windows machine. Of course there's factors like Windows being more hardware agnostic but it effectively means that today, no Mac older than 2013-2014ish/that aren't supported by macOS Big Sur isn't getting security updates. They do have options in terms of Windows (potentially), Linux, patched versions of newer macOS releases but for a user that's non-technical I think that's too soon. I was able to end my college career in 2019 by pressing my 2008 ThinkPad and Windows 10 into service. (albeit hi-res video and 3D games were naturally out of the question, it was up-to-date and got the job done - EDIT: but now that I think about it I did need patched Intel integrated graphics drivers...)
Of course, Microsoft's ditching of so many machines with the jump to Windows 11 and putting a 2025 expiration date on many machines (without bypassing or Linux) is abhorrent too and potentially renders part of my complaint moot but I still hope the ARM Macs have longer supported lifespans but too soon to say if anything will change.
Yeah, you caught it already, but I was gonna say, however good Microsoft has been about this before is irrelevant, because going forward their intentions are very clear with how little they care for backwards compatibility. The fact we have, what, 2 more years of Windows 10 support when most people still use it and can't update to 11 tells you all you need to know.
Windows 11 can still run programs made for old versions of Windows. I think it can still run Win32 programs as well.
Office products can open documents in old formats.
So yeah, they care about backwards compatibility. On the hardware front, I agree with you.
That would make sense apart from the ‘open a 30 year old laptop’ comment. There are plenty of 30 year old Macs about that will run on their original OS
I didn't say 30-year-old macs wouldn't run. As the matter of fact, that would be another example of the counter-claim that a 30-yr-old Sega Genesis can still run "while a surface duo couldn't do the same."
New Google Pixel devices have 5 years of Android version and security updates. And as someone else said, if updates end the hardware will usually continue to work if you take good care of it.
I have old Acer, Asus, HP and Toshiba laptops that still work despite being out of warranty and some are over a decade old, and I'm about to get my hands on a Thinkpad T480 that I'm hoping to upgrade to keep it for another few years.
The issue is mainly the apps. For the old laptops I mentioned for example, they have only two cores, and modern stuff like background removal in video-conferencing or playing some Netflix movie will bring their CPUs to their knees. Apps became extremely demanding without us noticing.
Same thing on phones. Frameworks based on web technologies, requiring something like Chromium WebView, are appealing to app developers because they're extremely convenient as they help them create shiny UIs with cool effects with a few lines of code while benefiting from portability (ie the app will usually be cross-platform and work on an iPhone too). The only issue is that is usually much more demanding than a native Android app. So this trend gives us the impression that phones become slower, that manufacturers are playing some tricks on us and that we need to upgrade, whereas it's much more complicated than that.
Dual cores can be fine if they have the necessary support for the features that the software asks for, like h.264 decoding for video calls. I worked in a charity that gave out repurporsed laptops for vulnerable communities and an 8th Gen Intel works really well for office work. Heck Zoom requests an 8th gen for said background removal.
The reality is, that most people don't care.
I know several people (and not only older ones) who actively avoid updating, because it annoys them apparently.
Others don't care, know about or value updates at all. Some will happily use outdated android versions 5 years after support was dropped, others buy new phones every 2 years anyway.
I'm not saying that's good, but from a fuck-everything-but-money capitalist standpoint, not supporting older devices does make sense.
Outdated devices can't run some newer apps. If yiu can't get security updates, then some banking or online trading apps might not run. Many businesses use 2FA. I might be wrong, but if a device isn't being updated for security then the device can't use used for 2FA. Similar deal with using it for payment at a store or using it as your key on your newer model car.
It all starts to steamroll.
You don't need to convince me. Fact is, enough people don't care. And if enough people don't care, 2FA vendors will get more lenient so they don't lose customers.
[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
That's before the companies realised that this is not where the money is unfortunately. Reminds me of the infinite light bulb story