zwekihoyy

~~these changes are going to decrease security overall. privacy and security are not one in the same~~. edit: I guess they edited the post🫠

also, logging in to aurora is almost guaranteeing your account getting banned. use a throw away account if the default ones are rate limited

not.. after.. security... hmm. 😶

are you under the assumption that fdroid has security benefits?

this is wildly elitist holy shit

that's crazy to me idk. merely seeing an ad annoys me enough to stop whatever I was doing. my inner contrarian avoids any product I've seen advertised.

can I... hear her argument? I just wanna know what fallacy has concocted here lol. not trying to be insulting to your wifi or anything, just bantering a little bit, I've come across some that believe adblocking is piracy though, and I'm curious.

this is testing privacy. not security. security would moreso fall under sandbox strength and trust placed on web content, which chromium beats Firefox a bit (fission being rolled out by default has decreased this metric, however.)

the thing about brave is whenever a company markets itself as privacy forward with no obvious business model/monetization strategy, it's safe to assume that, if they're not already, they will begin selling user data/ads heavily in the future. especially with brave searches lack of care towards web publisher's right not to be indexed, and Brendan eich generally being a gremlin of a human, I won't go near it. I'm not even starting with their crypto nonsense.

edit: and to the people saying they don't care what the CEO thinks just realize, by supporting the product, you support the company and in turn, the CEO. to support him means, at the very least, complicity with his views.