The BBC contacted Telegram for comment about its refusal to join the child protection schemes and received a response after publication which has been included.
Where is it? I didn't find it anywhere in the article.
The BBC contacted Telegram for comment about its refusal to join the child protection schemes and received a response after publication which has been included.
Where is it? I didn't find it anywhere in the article.
Is it really not true? How many companies have been training their models using art straight out of the Internet while completely disregarding their creative licences or asking anyone for permission? How many times haven't people got a result from a GenAI model that broke IP rights, or looked extremely similar to an already existing piece of art, and would probably get people sued? And how many of these models have been made available for commercial purposes?
The only logical conclusion is that GenAI steals art because it has been constantly "fed" with stolen art.
They explained what they're trying to do, but they didn't explain the how, and that annoyed me. Why do we have to wait for the countdown to know actual relevant information about this project?
This is so funny
Add in a test that wasn't made to be accurate and was only used to make a point, like what other comments mention
It's kind of stupid this even has to exist tbh
"Sorry, but we can't pay in advance, you'll have to put the work in first"
Is it? Didn't know about it until now...
You have to put /s
in the end, because people in this day and age can no longer recognize sarcasm, probably because we all spend way too much time on the Internet.
"Sure, we'll pay you 2% of the profits"
everything and their mother in 4k60
Here before someone makes a "yo mama" joke
We live in a capitalist society. You can do whatever you want as long as you have money or promise lots of money to powerful people.