It can start out a little like Office Space, doing all the standard tricks like walking in the front door with your arms full and in a hurry. And it always works. Until they hit the final boss: an IT security worker who has built an impenetrable fortress inside the company. Then it turns into Mission Impossible.
xthexder
I think it was assumed based on your use of command line and unix-like paths such as ~/Desktop
, which do not work in Windows Command Prompt. (Powershell has aliases for unix commands like ls
, so unix paths do work there)
I'm on the side of [email protected] here, since I read the comments before the article. Without the articles' context I had no idea if this meant all-time usage, per year, or per month.
Since the link is right there though, which says per year, it's really not a huge deal.
That does seem to be the point this thread is making: Going to space is really bad for Earth's environment. SpaceX and starlink are just accelerating that.
A perfect example of why calling it autopilot in the first place was a bad idea. The name misrepresents the feature, which is really just lane keeping and a few other minor things.
proton as leveraging open source to avoid dev costs
As a developer, I have no problem with this. Why do work that doesn't need to be done?
Damn, did they hire the Secret Service from Uvalde or something?
I'm making the claim that there is no such law that allows the MLB to prevent you from talking about a game. I'm not saying there is a law that's unenforceable.
Why can’t you keep your position consistent?
I'm not the person you were talking with earlier. I never mentioned AI, just the MLB copyright notice that you brought up.
I watched the first half of it on a plane ride and literally forgot about it until this comment. I don't think I'll ever see the ending
Copyright can't be applied to just talking about an event? MLB cannot copywrite facts such as who won a game or what occurred during the game. Their copywrite notice is not enforceable. https://medialoper.com/warning-those-copyright-warnings-may-not-be-entirely-accurate/
The only thing they can prevent is rebroadcasts and recordings of the game. Just talking about it is in no way related to copyright law.
My job has been to run things on GPUs for almost 10 years now. The only thing anyone practical is doing on that many GPUs is AI training, massive scientific simulations, or crypto mining. 1 or 2 of them is enough to run something like ChatGPT.
Real-time graphics it turns out don't scale well across multiple GPUs. There's a reason SLI has gone away for consumer GPUs. At the current ratio, each of those $3000+ GPUs is only driving 8000 pixels (assuming each led puck is being used as 1 pixel, given their size). It makes no sense other than bragging rights
Technically water is just Hydrogen-oxide.