It seems like it would be super easy for them to close this loophole. If you use the model that free tier listeners (real ones) will listen to about the same distribution of songs as the paying listeners, then just stop counting all free tier listeners and multiply the amount paid out for the pay-tier listeners by an appropriate factor to make payouts the same as before.
xantoxis
joined 1 year ago
Blowing vape smoke directly into the sensor to try to get the high score
I too, was coming here to say "burn down his house"
I dare Elon to sue World Bank.
Not to mention social security. "Not old enough to retire" is extremely literally true for many people.
Specifically Italians, at that.
Here's a question: DOES Trump vote? Do you think he even bothers?
Can you tell a guy first, I could have shorted
Eh, they understand "number go down"
Accurate.
No matter what question you ask them, they have an answer. Even when you point out their answer was wrong, they just have a different answer. There's no concept of not knowing the answer, because they don't know anything in the first place.
view more: next ›
Folks, the docker runtime is open source, and not even the only one of its kind. They won't charge for that. If they tried to make it closed source, everyone would just laugh and switch to one of several completely free alternatives. They charge for hosting images, build time on their build servers, and various "premium" developer tools you don't need. In fact, you need none of this, you can do all of it yourself on whatever hardware you deem to be good enough. There are also many other hosted alternatives out there.
Docker thinks they have a monopoly, for some reason. If you use the technology, you are probably already aware that they don't.