wholookshere

Can you at least see how both statements are whataboutism?

Yes that should be more talked about. So that makes this article invalid?

Except this whole article doesn't apply to android. Android AFAIK has 0 announced plans to do this. So why is it a concern?

When it comes to iPhones, it's not a shouldn't, it's a can't.

The way iOS limits background process means you can't. I develop for iOS apps for a living.

There's still you should never under any circumstances allow unsupported devices to be exposed to the internet or any way. Because that's how we get bot nets causing DDOS attacks.

An iPhone is not going to be that. This isn't phones in general doing this, just iPhones.

There are also far more efficient devices for that. More cost effective and more energy efficient.

I understand wanting to reuse old devices for something, but there's a limit to what is power efficient as well.

Encrypted is also the word to make people feel safer.

Correct but you also dont want an encrypted password. You want a hashed password.

What exactly do you think schools are?

I guess I expect the national energy commission to still regulate the plant to ensure safety standards are the same between public and private.

Chrome was started by google

While it used to be closed source the maintainer a couple years back decided to not make it a job, and open sourced, took down the hosted option, and nowaintains it as a side project open sourced.

Because that's not how LLMs work.

When you form a sentence you start with an intent.

LLMs start with the meaning you gave it, and tries to express something similar to you.

Notice how intent, and meaning aren't the same. Fact checking has nothing to do with what a word means. So how can it understand what is true?

All it did was take the meaning of looking for a number and strawberries and ran it's best guess from that.