webghost0101

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Oh my that damage control speech from Ford the article was forced to include does not work in the direction they hope it does.

There is actual fear to be perceived as Incompetent in there.

The reporters did very little to sugarcoat that they got told to edit it. Basically a copyPaste of fords demands of what needed to be talked about

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

There is a lot to unpack here. I think you misunderstand how the fediverse we're part of is designed for the dynamic I'm explaining.

First, I never claimed not everyone can afford self-hosting (that does not need to be) in their basement. You might be mixing up someone else's comment. In many cases its cheaper then joining someone else's.

Modern modems are already built with similar hardware to what's needed for self-hosting a small domain. Computers have become so cheap and accessible that it is trivial. For example, a Raspberry Pi can host many things for under $50.

I also discovered yesterday that a public “hackerspace” near me is saving computers from landfills precisely to be given away for free and used for self hosting + sharing the knowledge on how to set it up.

I'm curious where you live that self-hosting is illegal. That's a law I'd find so repulsive I'd need to break it on principle.

Your ideas about decentralized systems seem contradictory. You say only the rich could host under fediverse, but also believe it's illegal to self-host?

Dont ask why big centralized services would connect to ours and instead ask what reason we have to connect to centralized systems. I run my own cloud server; it's cheaper than a subscriptions. People are designing decentralized video hosting systems like PeerTube where everyone hosts their own videos. The proof is all around you here.

The fediverse operates exactly how you say is impossible. The question isn't why big servers would allow connections, but why I'd connect to centralized domains with so many decentralized alternatives available.

It's surprising you're here without knowing this. Maybe it's a sign decentralization is going mainstream?

You asked a more detailed explanation of how this works.

Here's how decentralized social media and web 3 actually works, right here and now. 

1. Instead of one central server, there are many independent servers (instances) run by different individuals or groups.

2. You create an account on one instance, but can interact with users on any instance.

3. When you post, it's stored on your home instance. Other instances your followers are on fetch and display your post to them.

4. If you want to follow someone on another instance, your server connects to theirs to get their posts. (The ability to connect = federated)

5. Each instance owner sets their own rules and can choose which other instances to federate with.

6. You can move your account between instances, taking your followers with you. (Wip) 

7. Popular fediverse platforms like Mastodon, Lemmy, and PeerTube all work this way, allowing cross-platform interaction.

This system allows for a social media experience similar to centralized platforms, but with more user control and privacy. No single entity owns all the data or controls the entire network.

Here is video from the Free Software Foundation which is a great source if you want to learn more about the hows and why.

https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/user-liberation-watch-and-share-our-new-video

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

I have nothing against having the option to donate, which has worked for many projects.

The idea you are sketching, it is a possible reality but that is the bad future to me.

There’s a threshold where the number of users makes it impossible for your service to still have any real sense of identity or intend and it ought to be broken up in smaller parts. Some of the larger instances have already passed that threshold in my opinion.

You did mention the solution, "The alternative is possible small scale" The good future is where every family has their own private instance and every business and service has their own public one, interconnected.

Keep things small, manageable, focused and responsible.

I do agree this (fediverse) likely won't last, not with so many predators waiting to grab a piece. Web3 is not here yet, as much as meta threads want to believe we are it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The meme does not confuse Sync with Foss apps, it points out that Foss is the rule here rather then an exception and Sync stands out among the others like a sore thumb.

So its a very bad example to how things are run here.

Now a good argument against this meme i have seen is that you shouldn't compare a Foss app with a non Foss app, oranges vs apples. But personalty i think all software should be Foss by principle (and many seem to agree here), so I am comparing software that is build using an ethical model vs software that is not.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Side note:

This meme is from a year ago:

I am not faulting you for this, your preferente is yours but it strikes me that sync is made for a demographic that would not be as much aware of open source philosophy.

In context of this what your saying makes more sense, I still very much disagree but i see better from what angle your perspective is coming.

If you do want to look around: voyager has blown me Away in how well it was designed. Blazing fast.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

I run some of those services that people use. 24/7 I have been doing so for years.

That does costs a lot of time and energy, i ask nothing In return. Well except they they wont be upset with me In person when i end up going dark. ( I’ll make sure to opensource provide it all naturally. )

Right now on lemmy, you are using a free service running on someones computer, there are no ads nor subscriptions to support it. If it would then i would be spinning up my own instance quicker then bender can imagine his own themapark.

The alternative isn't just possible, but the default way people have gotten things done since prehistoric times. Do things because we want to, share resources, providing for others. Lift everyone else up and you too will rise.

What i see when i observe services that complain about not being able to sustain without some form of financing is a lack of motivation and passion. To me they are a red flag that they are disfunctioneel by nature. I lose completely faith in there ability to provide competence or quality.

Of course i do understand that being unwilling to compromise morality under treat of poverty is an exception rather then rule.

But honestly how people do this shit and Not want to kill themselves in shame is actually weird to me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (15 children)

How about becoming literally disabled and pushed away from the one area i was deemed proficient in?

  • autists with visual sensory overload complications.

Seriously, if the internet is going to be like this, might as well pull the plug.

I have been investing in running my own services and programming my own life essential tools anyway. I will always be computer nerd but one of these years i am just going offline, trow my phone away and glue my mailbox shut.

And yeah this is anger talking but i am so fed up with this “someone must make profits to justify our existence” excuse. That is not how passion works.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Did some europeans countries not also have a retirement income of sorts?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

How exactly does one “outgrow” “AGI for the benefit of all humanity?

OpenAI Charter https://openai.com/charter

Our primary fiduciary duty is to humanity. We anticipate needing to marshal substantial resources to fulfill our mission, but will always diligently act to minimize conflicts of interest among our employees and stakeholders that could compromise broad benefit.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Depends on the goal doesn’t it?

Authoritarianism archives incredible luxury and comfort for a very small portion of people.

Communism archives collective well being and minimized suffering.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

“Free” ~tm~

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

To be fair i do care quite a bit about that. Phones just make bad computers to me. Small screen and half is used by a keyboard.

They seem designed to frustrate me so “it just works (most times)” is the only way i can stomach owning one.

I have a dream where apple is forced to make ios fully open source and where screen/input devices can freely stream any system/OS from a dedicated server.

Iphones are so “cleverly” dumb it makes them usable.

view more: ‹ prev next ›