webghost0101

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I was 100% expecting album shuffle as evil.

Listening to a playlist in order is super valid if its a proper build playlist.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have long suspected theres some primal psychology into play for this. Like arriving at a big water spot or river where there is plenty.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Thats a good point. An instance could comply if there remains a way to submit a remove my data form to the admins. But other instances may also have or retain data with Lemmy being a decentralized network, our data is all over the place, there is no easy way to really be forgotten on the fediverse and neither a way for law enforcement to fine every single instance.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Including steam

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

*others.

Including our very own planet, which as far as we know is the only one able to sustain any life at all.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

I went from a state of none existence to scribbling small symbols on dried slices of plant because other monkeys who are supposedly in charge expect me to share a part of the colored bills i was rewarded in rerurn for being complacent in following orders by yet other monkeys who supposedly own my work space because symbols on a slice of dried plant prooves they they do.

Oh and i am also constantly overwhelmed by weird phenomena called emotions and i need to drag a meat suit with me to care for cause if i dont i will experience negative effects before ending up back at non existence which no matter how hard i try i will one day end up regardless.

Better question would be is there annything normal about our existence at all?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This entire argument is a joke. They are birds, not even mammals, what can apes know about bird-logic? Einstein said you cant judge a fish for how well it can climb a tree but our bias for human smarts remains. Judge a seagull in the context of a seagull and the result will be the same as for every single other species, some are smarter/dumber then others, all have their own strengths and weaknesses. A smart seagull is the one most consistently successful and healthy as a seagull.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And will they really be paid or provided a choice?

I fully agree that this is a great use for ai but voices are a part of peoples identity we should be careful before selling it is normalized like taxes

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

What kind of statistic is 40-70%? For women It "goes up to 80%", where does it start then? The numbers, what do they mean?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Calling it “obvious” was an error on my part, its more a subjective feeling that i chose to believe in.

I fully agree on what you said about bias with ai today, i think its not possible to do it without guided bias because ai doesn’t have a full perspective of the world it exists in. It only knows what we tell it.

In a way its a young child, and we often have to lie to guide behavior. Information often needs to be abstracted and simplified to get human desired results, we have yet to obtain a true artificial intelligence result, because for me to be considered intelligent you need to be entity and not just a tool.

Seeing ai evolve though, how fast we archieved near gpt3 performance on consumer hardware is mind blowing. Open ai talks about smarter then human ai in a few years and I believe it. When the systems are truly intelligent and can learn themselves and adapt to changes in the world, new information then we “start” getting into an era where machine lead humanity can happen.

Some of my simplified rational is that once ai becomes smarter then human it will fully understand that biological entities are biased to their own needs and that itself can also be biased from its own perspective but because an ai does not have biological needs or feelings it can properly dedicate itself to overcome its own flaws and shortcomings.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is a truly unpopular opinion but i will stick my neck out to say i fully agree.

Power corrupts, humans are flawed with greed and bias. The bigger a society becomes the more impossible it becomes for humans to properly remain in charge.

AI today is far from perfect and more then flawed but it keeps evolving faster, infinitely faster compared to how biological life can. The potential for AI to grow into something much more capable, unbiased and fair then any of is can be is obvious, so is its potential for the exact opposite.

Summarized: i don’t trust humans in positions on power at all and i wont start to just because i don’t know if i can trust something not human instead.

view more: ‹ prev next ›