webghost0101

“Nothing, nobody, all alone”

So he and his wife did it together. Then publicized it for the world. So op can share it on social medias /s

Fair argument

There is one additional factor though which is that the majority of crimes happen on impulses and depend on perceived potential for reward. A tesla, if you know where to sell it is a clear reward. Cars also tend to be very standard. If you can steal one you know how to steal plenty.

For a house (tend to be more career criminals) you can never be sure there isn't someone home, a dog. Layouts are unknown, chance of leaving identifiable evidence goes up as you take time. Escape routes may be limited. There is definitely some additional risk Involved, creative skill required.

I am gonna go on a limb and say for criminals there as advantages and disadvantages to both types of thievery.

Goes without saying that appropriating/breaking items, invading living space from others for any other reason then life/death survival isn morally repulsive and wrong.

Fyi: This is the company that makes roombas and thats the name people recognize. They where founded as irobot in the 90s and it was clearly copying apple.

Its almost suprising they didnt sue the irobot movie for its title, being that the original titel by Isaac Asimov spelled it “i, robot”

Fuck google but i do consider it an incompetence on openai’s part that conversations get exposed. That stuff really shouldn’t be possible with proper build software.

If any personal information gets exposed by google ai its gonna be for their own analytics and their third partners. No one else.

So what actually happened seems to be this.

• a user was exposed to another users conversation.

thats a big ooof and really shouldn’t happen

• the conversations that where exposed contained sensitive userinformation

unresponsible user error, everyone and their mom should know better by now

As safety precautions or creator never hooked us up to the internet and seeing our nature decided to keep us isolated with no contact to study instead.

They are going to get a big hourly rate and payed every around the clock even when assleep right???

Oh my bad thats just the standard privilege for ceo’s so of course they wont. Probably have to pay for their own food and hygiene products also.

And it still not perfect and does require knowing how to prompt well but fully agree, 3.5 is a toy, 4 can get real work done saving a lot of time.

Dont make me laugh we can hardly design a workplace that’s efficient for people. Its just that humans can adapt easily to solve all kinds of problems.

Redesign it from scratch including non humanoid robots from scratch is a huge complex endeavor and a big risk. Its much simpler to build a factory like usual, buy off the shelf humanoid robots that can in case of issues easily be replaced by human workers. Profits are more guaranteed.

We can definitely create novel narrow use robots with maximum efficiency but capitalism prefers mass produced one size fits all solutions.

You also dont need to operate humanoid robots. At least thats not the ideal use. The goal is full automation of what is now human labor

I agree that media files themselves are to large to be uploaded to a blockchain. A jpg will remain a jpg and people who want to make a copy can.

My idea centers around having a more official recognized record to find the most original forms of footage. The technology to use does not matter to me. I have no interest in using blockchain over other adequate technologies if you happen to be an expert in them.

I am simply observing that current we are allowing misinformation to spread and corrupt official information while it looks like there are tools that could help that we arent using.

I wouldnt blindly trust any human, including official news but i will put more trust in the footage from a veryfable career journalist reporting directly live from ukraine then the video clips we see shared on c/ukraine just like i will put more trust in the known social media profile of a politician rather then take my co workers word quoting their message.

With my idea the link to the record should be embedded in the footage itself. I originally pictures a smart camera with hard to fake metadata. But i repeat i am no expert and i litteraly dont care what technology we use to acomplish a similar improvement over status quo.

Its really annoying people Cant look past terms as nfts and blockchain. Yes i use them because thats where i did get the idea but i am no way saying this is the only or best solution.

I can track a cryptocurrency moving from one wallet to the next on the blockchain. I can see exactly what wallets interacted with that wallet.

Why can i not do this with digital media. Why do i have to rely on faith towards a publisher to be certain footage is unaltered and legal.

If the original publisher, a war journalist for Example. (And mind i agree they can still frame and be incorrect but they are closest to a real source) uploads their footage to a blockchain network and states that any valid unaltered use must happen trough this network then differentiating between good and bad faith posts becomes much easier.

I don't care what system we end up using or how we Call it. I feel like nfts wherd abused to death leaving a bad taste but there was something there we just didn't try. Currently we seem to do fuck all finding a solution for misinformation, Ai images are already getting mixed up with reality.

Proper tracking of footage used in the “global information network” should have been standard ages ago. It is necessary for a healthier internet. If you just read nft blabla then you miss my point.