webghost0101

Its capped at 0.05% so basically meta made at least 22Bilion

You mean the installation which was provided for free as a “limited special offer” for new members but is actually already accounted for in the price?

The statistical majority appeared to hold an opinion of "Republicans are evil because they only care when issues affect them" otherwise the meme wouldn't have gotten so big. Yet the ratio on your comment tells a completely different story. I find it hard to comprehend unless bias.

I have an autistic tendency to observe intense patterns from very small details and i am math nerd. I am almost certainly partly overthinking it.

Thanks for having patience, have a nice day aswell.

Exactly, there is nothing wrong with your opinion or stance, i am raising awareness to a particularly subgroup of people that needed it. Cause i saw signals that they where around.

I kinda wish there was a way to comment without Having to bother you in the process.

Rereading the chain i should have worded it better to not sound so assuming that you where present at “yesterday’s meme rally” . Bias on my part. Excuzedmoi

I cant see the up/downvote ratio but i still expect many people here are hypocrites.

Right, this can get confusing. I’ll give t a go.

Lemmy.world is the community you are a part off, its also the community the meme example i shared on.

A community is not the same as a subreddit but as a tiny full reddit. Its run by admins who set rules and standards for the entire server they own and with tends to come sort of ideology. When you go to lemmy by default you will see the frontpage of your community only.

@memes, @technology within a community are call places but i don't like that naming. They are like a subreddit and i find they actually have the strongest community feeling and guarded ideologies. They are much smaller so if you see double standards within one of those its usually a sign of an echo chamber. This was not such a case.

Theres also the fediverse. Which is all lemmy and related servers that are federated. This is the bigger lemmy community that curates what gets to the front page of “all” because most of lemmy is progressive and safe for minorities other communities servers that openly welcome nazis and c-abusers have been defederated so they can no longer see or interact with eachother. If you both comment on the post on a neutral server then you wont even see eachother comments

Its very likely that at least one of the People upvoting you saw that meme 2 days earlier and thought “yeah they only care when they are affected, which is obviously wrong and i would never do it” simultaneously id expect people who felt really strong about that meme to be perceptive enough to recognize it in your comment and downvote it. (No offense) but because it was about Facebook, many peopl on lemmy dont have facebook. We all passionately hate it. You basically got people agreeing against their own ideology, which is again normal but does weaken that ideology.

Progressives like me should strive to care against that are wrong no matter if its us or someone else. I am not from ukraine or palestine, i dont have family or friends there but i know people are suffering and i want a better world for them, likeways i want the boomer population on facebook to have a better world where there data isn’t routinely stolen by Bigtech.

Theses usually a variation of this that makes it to all once a week.

https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/11663694

your reasoning does fit the spitit of this list. You dont care because its not your data.To be clear, i am not faulting you for having that opinion even while i personally disagree, i am trying to speak out about a rather noticeable case of double standards within the community.

Congrats, Lemmy is usually a vocal critic against those that "only care about issues when they affect them personally" but you managed to get upvotes.

I am not holding it against you, bias is human but it is something some of us should reflect about.

Holy crap didnt expect him to admit it this soon:

Zuck Brags About How Much of Your Facebook, Instagram Posts Will Power His AI

Depends who and how the model was made. Llama is a meta product and its genuinely really powerful (i wonder where zuckerberg gets all the data for it)

Because its powerful you see many people use it as a starting point to develop their own ai ideas and systems. But its not the only decent open source model and the innovation that work for one model often work for all others so it doesn’t matter in the end.

Every single model used now will be completely outdated and forgotten in a year or 2. Even gpt4 en geminni

You repeat your point but there already was agreement that this is how ai is now.

I fear you may have glanced over the second part where he states that once we simulated other parts of the brain things start to look different very quickly.

There do seem to be 2 kind of opinions on ai.

• those that look at ai in the present compared to a present day human. This seems to be the majority of people overall

• those that look at ai like a statistic, where it was in the past, what improved it and project within reason how it will start to look soon enough. This is the majority of people that work in the ai industry.

For me a present day is simply practice for what is yet to come. Because if we dont nuke ourselves back to the stone age. Something, currently undefinable, is coming.

If anything people really need to start experimenting beyond talking to it like its human or in a few years we will end up with a huge ai-illiterate population.

I’ve had someone fight me stubbornly talking about local llms as “a overhyped downloadable chatbot app” and saying the people on fossai are just a bunch of ai worshipping fools.

I was like tell me you now absolutely nothing you are talking about by pretending to know everything.

I even considered the main benefit to be that it was super traceable.

I once tracked some stolen crypto trough multiple Wallets and exchanges to find the one wallet where those hackers where keeping all the spoils.

Granted the owners of a wallet aren't public and thats a form of anonymity but surely intelligence agencies can figure it out.