webghost0101

Its true i do worry about shit ai being plastered within our devices but if you cut through the marketing you see a whole mix of machine learning and ai is used under the hood.

Some of these tools like ms paint auto removing backgrounds. And personal assistant like siri talking more fluently does seem like an improvement.

I have no hopes for winfows rewind but even for that we must admit its not actually available yet. Neither is apple ai.

So we are simply assuming that all of the tools they may put in are bad based on some current stupid ideas that are explored.

I commend you for believing most people know the difference.

Sadly thats not my experience.

The reporting are big clickbait but that doesn’t mean there is nothing left to learn from the old touring tests.

I dont know what the goal was they had in mind. It could just as well be “testing how overhyped the touring tests is when manipulated tests are shared with the media”

I sincerely doubt it but i do give them benefits of the doubt.

There is no competition in science (or at least there shouldn't be). You are subjectively disqualified from judging llm's if you draw your conclusions on an obvious trap which you yourself have stated is beyond the scope of what it was programmed to do.

To clarify:

People seem to legit think the jury talks to the bot in real time and can ask about literally whatever they want.

Its rather insulting to the scientist that put a lot of thought into organizing a controlled environment to properly test defined criteria.

In a normal conversation sure.

In this kind Turing tests you may be disqualified as a jury for asking that question.

Good science demands controlled areas and defined goals. Everyone can organize a homebrew touring tests but there also real proper ones with fixed response times, lengths.

Some touring tests may even have a human pick the best of 5 to provide to the jury. There are so many possible variations depending on test criteria.

The touring test isn't an arena where anything goes, most renditions have a strict set of rules on how questions must be asked and about what they can be about. Pretty sure the response times also have a fixed delay.

Scientists ain't stupid. The touring test has been passed so many times news stopped covering it. (Till this click bait of course). The test has simply been made more difficult and cheat-proof as a result.

The public versions of the ais used in Turing tests usually have less computing power. The test itself is often also highly specific in what and how questions can be asked.

This hardly news because models have passed the test before and as a result the test is made more difficult. It says nothing about intelligence and only about the ability to convincingly simulate a human conversation.

Forced quite breaks of nothing instead of adpocalyps Is such an unironic wholesome idea. Our brains really need that more.

I have a ytdl script download my “subscriptions” automatically to my jellyfin media server and an invidious server for everything else.

Its already is a much nicer way to watch content right now.

Former head but active agent absolutely

And yet if you look at the technical details, between Google, Apple n Microsoft. This does seem to be the lesser evil for privacy.

Of course if you have like a degoogled fairphone il bow down to you but if you also have a windows pc you’re screwed either way.