Why cant scientific progress not be a group effort with everyone doing their part according to their means?
Why does it have to be the greed addicts with the power to initiate human greatness and ingenuity?
Don't we all want essentially the same things?
sustainable production of (luxury) goods
sustainable power production
sustainable homes in a sustainable climate
to evolve as a species and explore more of the unknowns in the cosmos
Interesting discussion to have witnessed as an outsider.
Is an article written for a a writers expression or a readers enjoyment. (Both?)
I dont think they where frustrated with the writers enjoyment but rather disappointed that the article was a first discovery opinion rather then a veterans rediscovery from a modern point of view which would have been more useful to reflect their own opinion and thus be more personally entertaining. The negativity goed inwards perceiving it as a waste of their time.
This reads like an ai response. The first part is reasonably accurate, much more then my own classes thats didnt differentiate at all.
The continued part is a gptchat tell I think someone continued with “write another section on weed and club drugs like x y”
Its another tell that this section 2 is alot more unhinged then the first.
It is biased , probably the prompted “for a school to discourage” but its far from the worst ive seen and heard
I can confirm that this post and its image content does in fact really exist here on the internet.
No no the sign clearly says “GO” not “UNGO”
From the way i can see thats sign is at least 2/3 pro gov material.
I guess what there really winning is all those non tech-savvy people who currently have an adblocker installed because their friend helped.
We’re still a way of though.
Lol, they didn't even try to test the system if this is the result. Ai isn't intelligent but humans still take the cake of stupidity by having brains and not using them.
Many public stable diffusion models have a bias, porn often being overrepresented but all it takes is a "nude, naked, erotic, sex, nsfw " in the negative prompt and unless the model is build to only generate porn this will never happen. Or better yet, use some of that corporate money and build their own sd model that is verified to not included any nudity in its training data.
I mistook the post and didn’t know it was about bullying specifically so my comment was unwarranted
There have been other posts of late where my sentiment is more ontopic but here it only muddies the actual discussion.
Not sure why its still showing for you but i removed my comment seconds after posting as i misread and didnt know this was about bulling. I firmly stand against bullies of any kind.
Ever since the xz thing i have noticed a general increase in articles and clickbait titles spreading fear about open source software in general, its started to feel like intentional propaganda, for this post it was unwarranted.
Ps: please do confirm if my comments is removed by now on your end, i suspect comments may not always continue to sync between lemmy servers after the first initial postings.
There are so many sensible reasons to regulate these vapes and yet they go for protect the children.
How does banning disposable vapes which costs almost the same as cartridges for a non disposable vape help at all at protecting kids who would probably already stand out in the adult-oriented stores these are sold.
There needs to be proper quality control on these things with a set of ground rules for recycling and safe use. What does it matter if the user is 18 or 21?