watersnipje

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What a weird thing to worry a child about.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Is that Dr. Becky reporting?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Why do you give moldy, spoiled food to animals? It can make them sick too.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 2 months ago

👺 May your socks always be wet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

No. Nobody uses gradient descent anymore, it’s just the technique you learn about in beginner level machine learning courses. It’s about the color gradient in all the AI logos.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

That was one of the (many) things that mad me go “Yes! That’s what it was like! That’s what the internet was really like in 1999!” And those download accelerators, which we then recklessly installed on the family computer and gave it virusses.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Glad to see I’m not the only person on earth who has played it. Such a remarkable, funny and weird game. Still trying to get that damned Seepage song out of my head.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago

Yikes. OP is fortunate enough not to live in the USA.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Right, but the practicality? It would still be hard and expensive to catch every outlier case such as this one with drug testing.

[edit] I’ve looked it up and in the Netherlands, drug testing is only legal for some very specific professions where there is a risk of serious, large-scale harm such aa for instance pilots, like you mentioned. Other than that, it’s illegal because it’s medical information, and considered too invasive.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What are you suggesting? That they should run a urine test for magic mushrooms on every pilot before every flight? Obviously this was a very bad situation. But what scenario would have prevented this?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I don’t know, I guess so? Most drug tests are severely flawed, because many don’t test if someone is under the influence right now, they can test positive even when it’s longer ago and outside of worktime.

So in essence, you can get fired for being under influence at work, even though you’re not, because these tests are not good enough. And I think that’s nuts, aside from the massive invasion of privacy of giving an employer a claim to you bodily fluids.

Sure, you’re not supposed to use drugs. But is it your employer’s task to enforce the law? No, they’re not the police, and it’s none of their business what people do at home.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 months ago (11 children)

The whole workplace drug testing thing is so wild to me. An employer can actually lay claim to your bodily fluids? Absolutely mental.

In the Netherlands, it’s very simple:

  • if there are performance problems, then you address your employee’s performance problems.
  • if there are no performance problems, then there is no problem and what your employee does in their free time is none of your business.
view more: ‹ prev next ›