vorpuni

joined 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Lossy to lossless is fine it's just a waste of space.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If this holds up in court and becomes precedent it will create a lot of people with nothing left to lose with a lot of grudges against these companies. I can't say I would have any sympathy if executives became targets for heinous acts of violence stemming from such an injustice.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

It's consistent if they depend on copyright law to make money.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I agree, people buy cars like this though, to me modern cars are extremely annoying because of this extreme cost-cutting without any thought put into it. They even lack basic functions like dimming the gauge lights that were standard in the 1980s on cheap cars, or turning off a screen completely and still having the steering wheel controls for the radio… turning off ESP for getting out of slippery places that it gets confused by is also a challenge on a lot of cars.

People have very different priorities from commercial users that need an impeccable safety record and no compromise on reliability, they're buying a steel box on wheels to get from A to B, preferably in a fashionable shape.

If you've ever nearly died because the car decided a reflection was an imminent collision risk and braked hard on the motorway, you know that cars are way worse than Boeing.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Everything is integrated into the computer network for every function… so if you want an old style analog speedometer how analog do you go? Cable on the gearbox (no software, no bugs, no electronics if you choose a mechanical gauge)? Separate sensor near the transmission (basic analog electronics)? Analog readout from the multiplexed network on an electronic gauge?

Cars are already incredibly complicated and expensive to meet current legal requirements.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They can stop tracking you, that way they don't have to ask anything… which is precisely what they don't want to do and why they complained so much about GDPR. Lucky for them only a handful of European countries give a crap about privacy and actually enforce it in any meaningful way.

uBlock origin has lists to remove a lot of the popups (and blocks most trackers), browsing the Web in 2024 without it is torture.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

It isn't a cookie popup law, that's the advertising industry's spin on it. It's a law against taking personal data without consent and/or for illegitimate purposes (according to the lawmakers). You don't need a popup for essential cookies.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Using a VPN makes it a bit harder for your ISP and the French espionage apparatus to siphon your data as much as anyone not using one (ISPs have to keep a history for up to a year as well, it is a legal requirement to make it easier to spy on people). Of course with the laws in Five Eyes countries it won't actually protect your privacy 100% if you get your VPN service from there but I don't think France has the budget or capabilities to keep track of every foreign VPN company even with cooperation from other spy agencies.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

PeerTube isn't too bad if you're willing to host your own videos as a big creator, and smaller creators can pool resources for smaller instances.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

That might explain some insane replies I've seen in the past.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (3 children)

That's what I wrote.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (5 children)

They have DRM, even if easy to go around it, it doesn't make sense to pay loads for a shitty medium with obstacles to getting what's on it… it sends the wrong message to the criminal organisations peddling them.

view more: next ›