veniasilente

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

There's nothing to figure out, if the question is how "society" does it then the answer is literally taxes.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would you work for free for your workplace without a compensation beyond a $5 bill and a pat on the back at times because your boss felt generous?

Misleading question. These kinds of communities are volunteer-fed, so you are basically asking me if I would work for free for a charity, which is the point. Things change notoriously when the boss then decides to monetize the entire thing for themself and not for you.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Finally, even OpenSubtitles gets enshittified.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem with youtube in particular is there is no way to build an alternative that’s as good as YouTube

as good

I mean, assuming that's exactly what people wan, "exactly youtube but cheaper", then yeah it's an impossible and thankless task to even try something of that scale. Instead it's better to think of building youtube alternatives that are focused on one or two parameters that allow organizational optimizations. For example, much of the issue that people complain about is the storage, but a YT-alt that dedicates to eg.: archivism of old TV shows, that scan at best at 480p or 360p, wouldn't need to spend that much in storage compared to a service that is trying to serve 4K UHD 120fps Subwoofer Surround; that combined with the topical focus suddenly makes it much more scaleable and approachable.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Oh you sweet child. They only need to ban them for citizens, not for business / shareholders.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah it's like, the same way "pharmaceutics" get shiv'd into "pharma" (or "big pharma") "corporations" get shiv'd into "corpo".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't know either, I just assume that since it's 2023 and there's corpos, at least someone, somewhere, is thanklessly working on a FOSS language learning platform.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Instead of depending on a for profit / corpo for maintaining something like a whole language maybe that should be left to a coöp? Or at least something open source / Creative Commons so that people actually are authorized to contribute?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hate ads as much as anyone, but my question still remains for anyone who demands on blocking all ads and refusing to pay for premium, how do you expect servers and creators to be paid?

I'm pretty sure it's 2023 and this has already been discussed and solved ad nauseam, so I'm also sure all I'm going to say here is just repeated from elsewhere, but:

First of all, "creators" (not artists! There's a semantic difference) are not going to get paid better just because you pay for YT Premium. Premium pays Youtube, not the creators pleading not to be demonetized. If you're asking how are creators going to be paid, the answer is simple: directly. If you set up a service without intermediaries, for example a direct wire transfer, or at least something close to it like a Patreon, you get all of the coins and people who want to pay you-but-not-Youtube (or whatever platform) face a better incentive.

Second, stuff like gift cards.

Third, and this is something I've never seen any naysayer deal with properly: the same methods that have existed before can still work now. I don't remember ever paying rent for Usenet, or IRC, or BBSes, yet those things were literally plentiful, if I so much as lifted a rock in a cropped 8-bit-color grayscale PNG, the tranparency layer had a link to a BBS. And part of the issue is that there's a "attention deficit oooh shiny syndrome" going on where instead of using vintage-timer, battle-tested, lightweight, low dependency, cheap payment, low maintenance protocols and services for ensuring persistence and continuation of communities, we are for some weird reason insisting that whatever community launches next is a Perfect Imitation fo Youtube, or else. Such is the case of Matrix: for all its promises, IRC and XMPP are much better battle-tested and for the monthly price (and monthly annoyance) of 1 Matrix server you can run about 25 XMPP servers, or likely over 300 IRC servers.

And the key here is that it's the devs who have to take the turn return towards simpler, better tech. Devs gotta lead by example. Users (masses of) are obviously not going to be the ones to do it.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (15 children)

As per usual, it's a matter of content.

I can't (and shouldn't have to) carry the entire weight of a fandom on my shoulders. Until there's more activity here on those subjects, I have to at least keep an eye on Reddit.

What I always do when I can however, is I try to do POSEO to raise awareness: by which I mean, I post my opinions or ideas or stories in my own site (or in my Masto main) first, and only crosslink on Reddit. I was thinking of doing the same with reply comments as well, but dunno how much would that promote interaction.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even worse for privacy, it uses the Chrome engine.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I think we really need the US to intervene sooner rather than later.

Hah! You wish.

Currently, they'd ~~join in with the nsdap~~ sell fuel and maintenances for the gas chambers.

view more: ‹ prev next ›