underisk

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 35 points 7 months ago

how is it an experiment to restore things to the way they used to be? pretty sure we already know how it works out.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

people do pay for discord though. that was the entire justification for Nitro and Server Boosts. they made $440 million in revenue in 2022. they aren't publicly traded so there's no way to compare that with expenses, but i'd be pretty surprised if they weren't turning a significant profit.

[–] [email protected] 72 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Another dev who forgot to .AddGameplay()

[–] [email protected] 29 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Non invasive BCI capable of the exact stuff neuralink has demonstrated has existed for a while and its probably a much more viable way to help the disabled than cramming chips into their head.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago (2 children)

There certainly is a history of attacking Apple over their use of encryption. I wonder if they're still mad they didn't get that iPhone backdoor they wanted.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In fairness I may be mistaken. It seems ISPs were extended common carrier protections in relation to hosting Usenet and email and I conflated that with the protocols themselves. Either way it was a long time ago and I doubt they’d extend those protections to generic web platforms these days, but I’d sure like someone to set a precedent for it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

I don’t think comparing a federated message board to smuggling drugs is as fair a comparison as say email or Usenet, also federated services which have both been granted common carrier in the past, but go off I guess.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (8 children)

Legally I think they’d probably be exempted from liability as a common carrier, similar to how your email server isn’t going to get sued if you mail someone a link to piracy. I doubt they’re interested in testing that theory though.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

What do you consider difficult to do with CSS that wouldn’t also be difficult without it?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Not sure about your particular situation but there’s also the possibility that the bad CSS was good CSS when it was written and over time that got superseded by advancements in both technology and practice.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

wouldnt it make more sense to do a trial that tests their supposed advantages over purpose built robots rather than one which decidedly does not

view more: ‹ prev next ›