uienia

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

If that is the only place you have seen Christopher Walken, then you seriously need to update yourself on Christopher Walken movies. He is great in everything he is in, and you are missing out on a legend of a man.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Sure thing, Musk.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s not whataboutism to point out the accusing side doing the exact same thing, that is simply called pointing out hypocrisy.

It is literally the definition of whataboutism, you muppet.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Cool. Then you get what you want, because this is exactly what tiktok is.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

It is funny how easy it is to spot monolingual Americans attempting to write like non-native English speakers.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

How about adressing the issue instead of just cresting strawmen about the messengers?

This feature is an actual fundamrntal privacy issue.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It seems to me that the major issue people were complaining about was the thing even existing in the first place (and rightly so). So by them still wanting to implement it, they have fixed absolutely nothing.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

This argument keeps missing that it is not only the quality but mainly the quantity of fakes which is going to be the problem. The complete undermining of trust in photographic evidence is seen as a good thing for so many nefarious vested interests, that this is an aim they will actively strive for.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

It is the quantity of fakes because of the easy process which is going to be the problem. Fake pictures will very soon outnumber real, and the amount of them will still kerp grjwing exponentially even after that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The thing is that in the future the mere quantity of fakes will make the careful vetting process you describe physically impossible. You will be bombarded with high quality fakes to such an extent that you will simply have to give up trying to keep up, so it will be a choice of either dropping the vetting process or dropping bringing any pictures altogether. For profit driven corporate jwbed media outlets, the choice unfortunately will be obvious.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, it is going to be mainly a quantity issue rather than a quality one. The quality of faked photos has already been high since photoshop. Now a constant growing avalanche of high quality fakes (produced by all sorts of different vested interests with their own particular purposes) is going to barrage us on a daily basis, simply because it is cheap and easy

view more: next ›