ugh

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 28 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No ads doesn't mean no data collecting

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

I'm glad to see that we're not all addicts here

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The headline is very misleading. Porn companies are considering facial recognition as an option for validating age. Governments are putting more pressure on porn websites to keep minors away from the content, but it's very hard to thoroughly prove your identity online. A government issued photo ID is useless if you have nothing to compare it to visually. That's why many websites use bank/credit card info as opposed to an ID.

It is definitely a privacy concern if you worry about it being known that you watch porn, but I don't think it's right to fault the company.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I guess it would generate a bigger pool of people if they want to get super technical about who they want to genocide. US citizens already have to hand over their demographics to the government, but worst case... I could entertain that idea.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

That's a good point that I hadn't considered. I'm not sure how that would go over legally in the US. They could gather very similar information by looking at records from relatives who have used the same insurance company, even just financial records, but that is monitored closely by the government. I wonder if we'll be seeing any lawsuits in the near future.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (5 children)

I struggle to see what someone could do with that information. My ethnicity is already known by the government and every advertiser collecting my information online. I randomly had my identity connected to my cousin's before any family took DNA tests. Her name would show up in those questionnaires along with what car I've owned and where I've lived when I had to go through online government stuff.

I'm relatively paranoid about giving out personal information, but I don't consider my spit very sensitive.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

They don't care about women who are considering abortion. I'd be more worried that they'd implement a less reliable test.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

My 1995 truck could handle that throw, but sure, we'll call it "innovation"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

A lot of people are getting back into pirating because of this. If a show isn't on a streaming service you use, you either pay $2/episode and hope that Amazon doesn't drop it, or you pirate it. I went almost a decade without pirating, and now I just bought a 5tb SSD for my Plex server. I'm tempted to fully convert now that I've already set everything up, too.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

Which is almost impossible now. You can't even play offline games without internet access because companies force you to use their app to launch it.

I thought I would be able to get around that system with EA by purchasing a hard copy of the game circa 2016, but nope, I just bought a plastic case to throw away. I miss the old days of owning things.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You can't even buy MP3s anymore?? I haven't paid for a digital download since before smart phones. I would be more concerned about downloading digital content from a website that charges for it rather than pirating tbh. Where did the seller get it from in the first place??

That's not a bad black-market business model, actually....

view more: next ›