tutus

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Glad I was sitting down when I read that. Nobody could have predicted that Instagram would only pay lip service to removing harmful content /s

Meta is one of the Evil Corp who is killing people, and destroying lives, through pursuit of profit. It's goal is to frame the health and well-being of people and society to allow advertisers reach a bigger, better and an easier manipulated audience.

I know it's a cliché, and I don't use this often as things have many sides, but I do wonder how people justify this to themselves and what they see when they look in the mirror.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Always. Follow. The money.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 8 months ago

"The decision to shut down Keen is in line with Google's shift away from social media and follows a trend of ~~Area 120 projects closing due to company restructuring and layoffs in 2023~~them killing everything they build."

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago

Let's have tab rows back first, shall we? Reverting to CSS that you break every damn release is just stupid.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I have nothing to add here, I just wanted to say thank you for these interesting details. An upvote didn't feel like enough.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

That depends on how you look at it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You okay love? You need a hug?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 8 months ago (6 children)

This is perhaps the stupidest response I've read on Lemmy for a while. Nobody is entitled to an opinion these days.

Im expecting a response, quoting each paragraph I wrote, with only 'For you' as the text.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago

"India internet"

What does this even mean?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Not everything is an algorithm or ratios. Hopefully you know that.

This is just straight up wrong.

It's not but you do you.

You obviously had an issue with the statement as-made by the CEO.

Go back and read what I wrote. I never wrote that.

The question you’re dodging is essentially “how different would it have to be for you to not have the issue you’re having right now?”

Read what I wrote. You'll find your answer in there.

Unless, of course, you’d just be angry no matter what. If this is the case, it would easily explain why you’re throwing out non-answers and superfluous catty dialogue.

If you don't read what I'm saying, me repeating it again, isn't going to help that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I do. Very important. That's not what happened here.

I don't believe showing up, making a statement and then fucking off again is any kind of 'discussion' or 'taking responsibility'. It's PR.

Paying lip service to recurring issues (and this seems to have escaped people: this has happened multiple times) that are damaging people, is not taking responsibility. It's PR.

view more: next ›