I have a penis. My partner a vagina. She's way better with money than me and uses trig every day for her work (lighting design is math intensive).
Meanwhile, I yell at my computer trying to get my remedial fraction homework figured out.
treefrog
joined 1 year ago
Brave is a marketing browser masquerading as a privacy browser.
Just use Firefox. Mozilla is a nonprofit and Firefox is open source. It's really not hard to switch.
Not my browser history. I use private browsing... and Firefox!
They're arguing their bing devision and some others should be excluded.
Windows is still a huge market share of OSs. So, the law is capable of saying this part of Microsoft is a gatekeeper, and this part not, is what I'm saying.
The Buddhist economy is essentially a gift economy that has survived for 2500 years.
Shit, our genealogy is also basically a gift economy, and one much more ancient than Buddhism.
Which is my way of saying I think the system is in our nature. If we can learn to embrace life and stop being so terrified of our individual deaths.
The best systems happen organically after all. And without coercion.
People are capable of both competition and cooperation.
Capitalism goes out of the way to make the former a value.
Yes, greed is in our nature. But so is altruism. And the idea that people are just greedy by nature, and that all altruism has ulterior motivation, is something capitalists have actively encouraged to justify their values.
So yes, when it comes to greed in the West and how it's become a value rather than a sin (Jesus eye if the needle parable), I blame capitalism. Of course, if humans didn't have the capacity for greed capitalism wouldn't exist.
But to dismiss capitalism as a non-factor at this point in history because humans are greedy by nature, well, it's propaganda and not based on a modern scientific understanding of human nature.
That's a lie capitalism has sold us to justify it's value system.
Alright, the article convinced me of the legal argument.
Morally and ethically I think my main issue is knowing that for profit corporations will be putting many of my flesh and blood favorite artists out of work without any sort of compensation.
Really we just need UBI. I think the issue is less about plagiarism and more about livelihood for most people worried about it.
I'd love to hear the mental gymnastics behind this comment.
I'll read the links.
Personally, I don't have an issue with people copyrighting things they use an AI to make. I'll let you know if my opinion changes on fair use of already copyrighted work being used to make (commercial) AI.
Right. It's not our AI. It's Google's AI. It doesn't work for us anymore than Facebook does.
There to spy and sell you shit. It's not your friend but a high tech used car dealer.