treefrog

Can we get UBI before we start abolishing people's income though?

The tools are valuable for sure.

Where the law is on copyright it looks like we're figuring out. For now I'm glad to see rulings like this as it will, hopefully, take some of the wind out of Hollywood studios and aide union negotiations.

Then it's public domain according to cases so far.

My point is that this description literally applies just as much to humans. Humans are also trained on vast quantities of things they've seen before and meanings associated with them.

In which case the machine would get the copyright (which legally they can't now), not the prompter.

I thought this was in my sci-fi feed and the name of an interesting novel.

Almost upvoted it

There's a difference. When you program a machine it follows rigid logic. It's predictable.

When you train a machine it does not. It can make its own inferences and operate outside of strict parameters. It can also make bad inferences, what we call AI hallucinations.

I don't know that what you're saying is wrong about avoiding responsibility, but programmed is not the right word for what's basically a genie in a bottle. And we still hold accountable the member of the tribe that lets the genie out, or should anyway.

Or one of the ninty nine percent of people who don't give the AI their symptoms in medical terminology.

First in medical spending. 40th or 50th in positive medical outcomes.

Among Western nations.

I don't think your comment really disputes anything the previous poster said.

But maybe you read the first lines and skimmed the rest (I certainly do that more often than I would like).

I thought the bald guy was Bezos

Install Firefox?

That was my solution anyway.

I just checked. Mozilla has both a non-profit and a for profit division.

Both support Firefox.