The c-suite of this company should be publicly tried and executed for placing people directly into harms way for fake service calls.
trackcharlie
I was dualboxing windows and endeavouros until I realized I was getting objectively superior performance for all games on linux. Deleted windows entirely and haven't looked back since.
This is going to be great for people distributing misinformation.
Good work google, making sure people have an even HARDER time distinguishing reality on your platform.
Workers were always going to be replaced and automated pretending otherwise is disingenuous and caters to the absolute most inept among us.
People need to start bitching about taxing these organizations and supporting UBI.
Because they got paid to say 'potentially' in order to downplay the seriousness of verizons ineptitude. These news organizations do not report on the news to inform people anymore they alter the presentations of their investigations in order to appease their various shareholders, and wouldn't you know it, their largest shareholders are corporations or affiliated persons. Just like every other news organization that gets large enough now days.
Then apple shouldn't be an anti-consumer piece of shit
They could fucking start by going bankrupt so open source alternatives that actually give a shit about privacy can take over. Revolt chat is objectively superior to discord
Between me and my room mate we've downloaded approximately 1202tb this month and uploaded about 105tb.
AFAIK unlimited = unlimited. If there's a limit we've not hit it yet.
I can understand where you're coming from but it's not like the commenter lied. Both musk and trump have court cases involving sexual assault in various countries and our adversaries are getting one over on us because of the incompetence of every politician, not just left or right.
Perhaps I am seeing it in a different light but it sure seemed to me like billionaire and politician bashing as opposed to 'orange man bashing'.
I said fairly based. The commenters preoccupation with the fascism connection was odd but the rest was pretty much on point for presenting a theory as to why the torrent had been removed and re-added. The commenter added additional commentary to present a parallel for what the torrent uploader was doing in order to obtain more public interest.
In reference to your last line, you realize that the vast majority of the political sector is financially vested in 'taking action' against piracy, right? And by financially vested I obviously mean bribed by corps like MGM or UMG et al.
No. And anyone who cares should just be fully ignored because their opinions aren't worth shit.