toastal

joined 4 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You can tell the tool was built by Torvalds… other VCSs call this command credit or annotate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This is why I use darcs. VCSs based on patch theory have less conflicts.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

I could tolerate well-behaved static image banners, but you know it would all be distracting videos at the least.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Is this the real reason polka was invented?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What I expected to see is not the same as what I expect someone to do.

Mailing lists used to be the norm, more free software has been migrating… but also in this specific case the maker is promoting user not use a Google-owned proprietary platform while hosting on a Microsoft-owned proprietary platform which smells of hypocrisy--especially when with code forges there are several great alternative options.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There’s a cost to doing the (re)encoding & storing multiple version of video. It’s relatively not more data to send one codec versus another, but storage & processing aren’t free either (especially with AV1 requiring hardware encoding unless you want to grind forever on a file).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Naturally. Is there a term like greenwashing or sportswashing but for free software?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (3 children)

This is why I don’t trust Rich Communication Services (RCS) being developed by the big tech giants. I can almost guarantee it’s meant to meet minimum legal requirements otherwise Google, Facebook, et al. would have reverted their services to XMPP federation on a protocol with now even more years of battle testing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (3 children)

That’s still a lot of monthly money for a lot of folks which hurts accessibility for many, not all. The fact that we can’t agree on codecs throws yet another wrench in things as you need multiple resolutions & formats. I’m happy it exists tho & uses distributed serving.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Implying Lemmy is the only link aggregator? There are others, informal group & DM sharing as well.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago (8 children)

One advantage of linking a YouTube video in an aggregator setting is if the video goes viral, everyone is spamming Google’s server for delivery instead of hammering smaller services. Video is pretty expensive, so for now I see no issue abusing YouTube (assuming everyone here is already ad-blocking & DNS sinking anyhow).

view more: ‹ prev next ›