tinkeringidiot

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

So much this. I started using it during Covid, and it’s been so great that I prefer Sams over any other shopping experience.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago

Is it “don’t use them and just keep track of your stuff”? Because that seems like the most right answer here.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 10 months ago

Continue living my life as if federal shenanigans mostly don’t affect daily life, because they don’t.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Hence people falling back to “I don’t care” as a defense mechanism. The world is too big, and there’s too much awful happening, to emotionally invest in all of it. Not and stay sane. It’s so much easier to narrow focus to your own life and pursuits, and let everything else be what it is.

And so we get these useless platitudes, because “I don’t care about that” can be both true and socially unacceptable at the same time.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

New socially acceptable ways to say “I don’t give a crap”.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 11 months ago

Bold of you to assume there’s QA happening on govt UIs.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

That’s…a good portion of the free email providers on the planet. Even if companies are using this list as a filter for signups, it’s only going to be for a limited time.

Companies want new accounts. They don’t mind very much if those accounts are fake - big numbers get investor attention. It only takes a handful of support cases with “I tried to register but it says my email address isn’t allowed” before the C-suite makes it clear to IT that this filter is no longer in sync with the corporate strategy.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Unfortunately DoD is right. PFAS are terrible things, but they’re used everywhere (including consumer goods at an astonishing rate) because they’re really effective. Once there are good alternatives, yes let’s ban them forever, but until then we’d all notice their absence in our goods in a big bad way.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

According to the rental company I use for work travel, I’ve driven 33 different brand new cars this year, primarily sedans and small SUVs, all ICE (not a lot of EV on rental lots). Every single one had the auto start/stop feature.

Vehicles without it exist, especially as you mention full and partial electrics. But I’m perfectly comfortable with how I represented the situation based on my own experiences.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It’s not explicitly required by law, but that doesn’t make it any less mandatory. It’s one of those “we’re not saying you have to, we’re just saying we’ll beat you up if you don't” rules federal agencies (EPA, in this case) love so much.

Car and Driver explains some of the reasoning here, though they forget to mention efficiency standards that are explicitly mandated.

https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a19561461/automakers-increasingly-offer-ways-to-deactivate-stopstart-systems-temporarily/

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (7 children)

Oh, sorry. American cars are require to ship with a feature that shuts the engine off at stop lights, and restarts it when you take your foot off the brake. It’s done to supposedly help the environment, which it doesn’t do in the least and is also incredibly irritating.

So car hackers reconfigure their cars to disable that feature.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (9 children)

Cars are computers. All those fancy features run on software. Software can be patched to get rid of unpleasant functionality.

It’s not always easy, but it’s doable, and the more of these stupid features they add, the more people spend time working on undoing them.

view more: next ›